Nitesh Agarwal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:20867) on 1 May, 2025

0
27

[ad_1]

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Nitesh Agarwal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:20867) on 1 May, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:20867]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2986/2024

1.       Nitesh Agarwal S/o Rajendra Kumar Agarwal, Aged About
         36 Years, R/o 1-T-3, Talwandi, Kota
2.       Rohit Choudhary S/o Naveen Kumar Choudhary, Aged
         About 42 Years, R/o 63, Jadon Nagar-B, Durgapura,
         Jaipur.
3.       Manoj Kumar Gupta S/o Purshottam Gupta, Aged About
         33 Years, R/o 36 Badhari Mohalla, Near Ganga Mai
         Mandir, Behror, Alwar.
4.       Kalu La Rajora @ Ajay S/o Ramesh Chandra Teli, Aged
         About 31 Years, R/o Village Pur, Near Bus Stand,
         Brahmapuri, Bhilwara.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Mamta Sharma w/o Deepak Kumar Sharma resident of D -
570 Sanjay Colony, Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Abhishek Mehta
                                Mr. Dilip Choudhary
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

01/05/2025
For the reasons indicated in the Interlocutory Application

No.01/2025, the same is allowed.

The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the F.I.R.

No.56/2024, registered at Police Station Subhash Nagar, Dist.

Bhilwara, for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B, 354 and

452 of IPC.

(Downloaded on 01/05/2025 at 09:53:06 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:20867] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2986/2024]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

parties have settled their disputes and have arrived at a

compromise.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on a

decision of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh

Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012)10 SCC 303].

He therefore prayed that the impugned FIR may kindly be

quashed.

Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the factum of

compromise and submits that in view of the compromise, the

complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

In view of compromise arrived at between the parties and

applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh (Supra), this Court

deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers under Section

482 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed. F.I.R.

No.56/2024, registered at Police Station Subhash Nagar, Dist.

Bhilwara, for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B, 354 and

452 of IPC, and all subsequent proceedings sought to be taken

thereunder against the petitioners, are quashed.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
232-divya/-

(Downloaded on 01/05/2025 at 09:53:06 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here