Ombir Singh vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 July, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Ombir Singh vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 July, 2025

                                                                1

                                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL No.       of 2025
                              (Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No.5324/2025)



     OMBIR SINGH                                                                        Appellant(s)

                                                             VERSUS

     STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI                                                        Respondent(s)



                                                       O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

appellant and the learned ASG appearing for the

respondent.

3. The present appeal arises out of the impugned order

dated 21.02.2025, passed by the High Court of Delhi in

Bail Application No. 4031 of 2024, whereby, the High

Court has dismissed the said bail application filed by

the appellant seeking regular bail, in connection with

the FIR No. 430/2023 registered at Police Station-GTB

Enclave for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B,

498-A,406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant

submitted that some of the other co-accused have already
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
NISHA KHULBEY
Date: 2025.07.30
17:37:34 IST
been granted bail by the concerned Courts.
Reason:

5. Learned ASG appearing for the respondent has

vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the appellant by
2

submitting that the allegations against the appellant,

are very serious and the prayer for bail needs to be

rejected.

6. Admittedly, the appellant is the father-in-law of

the deceased, and has been under incarceration nearly for

roughly one year and 11 months, and only 08 out of 22

witnesses have been examined before the Trial Court so

far.

7. Considering the aforesaid and the submissions made

by the learned Senior counsel for the appellant, we are

inclined to set aside the impugned order.

8. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside

and it is directed that the appellant be released on

bail, subject to such terms and conditions that may be

imposed by the Trial Court.

9. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

……………….J.
(M.M. SUNDRESH)

……………….J.
(NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

New Delhi
28.07.2025
3

ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-D

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5324/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-02-2025
in B.A. No. 4031/2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
Delhi]

OMBIR SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent(s)

Date : 28-07-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit, Adv.
Mr. Vimal Tyagi, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Vats, Adv.
Mr. Angad Pahal, Adv.

Mr. Lavam Tyagi, Adv.

Ms. Ishita Khurana, Adv.
Mr. Ishaan George, AOR
Mr. Santosh Kumar Prasad, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :

Mr. Satya Darshi Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Amit Sharma-b, Adv.
Mr. Abhinav Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(NISHA KHULBEY) (POONAM VAID)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(signed order is placed on the file)