Introduction
Oral evidence is essential in legal proceedings, serving as a primary method for establishing facts and assertions in a court of law. Under the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan (Indian Evidence Act, 2023), oral evidence is evaluated alongside documentary evidence to assess the truthfulness of claims. This article examines the admissibility, reliability, and legal significance of oral evidence, particularly in relation to Sections 54 and 55 of the Act..
Definition and Importance of Oral Evidence
Oral evidence refers to statements made by witnesses under oath during a legal proceeding. It includes testimony given during trials, hearings, or depositions and serves as a means to verify facts that may not be adequately covered by documentary or physical evidence.
Under Sections 54 and 55 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan, oral evidence plays a key role in proving facts that a witness directly perceives. These sections provide guidelines on how oral evidence should be recorded, assessed, and used in judicial proceedings.
Section 54: Direct Oral Evidence
Section 54 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan states:
“All facts, except the contents of documents, may be proved by oral evidence.”
This provision emphasizes that oral evidence can be used to prove facts, except where documentary evidence is required. Section 54 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan states that:
- Oral evidence must be direct – The testimony given by a witness must be based on what they have personally seen, heard, or perceived.
- No hearsay rule – Hearsay evidence, or second-hand statements, are not admissible unless they fall under specific exceptions.
- Witness Competency – The person providing oral evidence must be competent to testify and capable of recalling and narrating facts accurately.
Section 55: Oral Evidence in Relation to Documentary Evidence
Section 55 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan states:
“Oral evidence shall, in all cases whatever, be direct; if it refers to,—
(i) a fact which could be seen, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he saw it;
(ii) a fact which could be heard, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he heard it;
(iii) a fact which could be perceived by any other sense or in any other manner, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he perceived it by that sense or in that manner;
(iv) if it refers to an opinion or to the grounds on which that opinion is held, it must be the evidence of the person who holds that opinion on those grounds.”
This provision ensures that oral evidence must be direct and based on personal knowledge, preventing reliance on second-hand accounts. Section 55 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyan provides that:
- Oral evidence cannot override written documents – If a fact is required by law to be proved by documentary evidence, oral evidence alone is not sufficient.
- Supplementing written records – Oral evidence may be used to explain ambiguous parts of a document but cannot contradict a clear written agreement.
- Exceptions – In cases where documents are lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable, oral evidence may be admitted under certain conditions.
Role of Oral Evidence in Legal Proceedings
Oral evidence under Sections 54 and 55 is crucial in various types of cases, including:
- Establishing direct facts in criminal and civil trials.
- Explaining the circumstances surrounding a written contract or transaction.
- Verifying the credibility of witnesses through cross-examination.
Limitations and Challenges
Despite its significance, oral evidence comes with certain limitations:
- Subjectivity and Bias – Witness testimony may be influenced by personal biases, leading to inconsistencies.
- Memory Issues – Over time, a witness’s recollection may fade, affecting accuracy.
- Contradictions and Cross-Examination – Oral evidence is subject to scrutiny through cross-examination, where inconsistencies may be exposed.
- Preference for Documentary Evidence – Courts often give higher weight to written records over oral statements in legal matters.
Conclusion
Oral evidence, as outlined in Sections 54 and 55 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, plays a crucial role in legal proceedings. Section 54 highlights the importance of direct oral testimony, while Section 55 establishes that oral evidence cannot take precedence over documentary evidence. Legal professionals must thoroughly assess oral evidence to build a strong and credible case before the court.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India