P C Jayamma vs N S Narayana on 2 August, 2025

0
3

The present complaint is filed under section 200 of

code of criminal procedure against the accused seeking to

punish him for the offence punishable under section 138

of the Negotiable Instruments Act ( in short referred as “N.I.

Act”).

02. The averments of the complaint are summarized as

under :

It is alleged that, in the year 2015 the Complainant

has received a sum of Rs.12 lakhs as maintenance from

her husband through the court of law and the accused had

knowledge about the Complainant receiving this amount.

The accused has requested the Complainant to lend hand

loan of Rs.6 lakhs for his family needs and assured to

repay the same within 3 months therefore on 01.10.2015

the Complainant has advanced hand loan of Rs. 6 lakhs to

the accused. After expiry of the assured period when the

Complainant has demanded the accused to repay her

hand loan, the accused has dragged the time by giving one

or other reasons till April 2022. Thereafter the accused

issued 3 cheques of Rs.2 lakhs each bearing No. 198885

dated 20.04.2023, No. 198886 dated 20.12.2022 and

198887 dated 20.08.2022 all the cheques drawn on Bharat

Bank, Peenya Branch, Bangalore. However, the

Complainant has presented the cheque bearing No.

198887 dated 20.08.2022 for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- with

her banker for realization on 22.08.2022. But the said

cheque returned unpaid due to “Funds insufficient” in the

account of drawer as per bank return memo dated

23.08.2022. Thereafter on 21.09.2022 the Complainant

got issued demand notice to the accused through her

advocate, which was served the accused on 22.09.2022, for

which the accused gave reply through his advocate on

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here