Padmalochan Biswal vs State Of Odisha & Another …. Opposite … on 17 June, 2025

0
1

Orissa High Court

Padmalochan Biswal vs State Of Odisha & Another …. Opposite … on 17 June, 2025

Author: V. Narasingh

Bench: V. Narasingh

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                           ABLAPL No.4901 of 2025

             Padmalochan Biswal               ....              Petitioner
                                            Mr. B. Pasayat, Advocate
                                       -versus-

             State of Odisha & another        ....     Opposite Parties
                                                   Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA
                                                  Mr. S. Dash, Advocate
                                                            (Informant)

                         CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
                                     ORDER

17.06.2025
Order No.

02. 1. Mr. Dash and associates have entered
appearance on behalf of the Informant by filing the
Vakalatanama. The same is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State so also learned counsel
for the Informant.

3. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in
connection with G.R. Case No.212 of 2025 pending
on the file of learned S.D.J.M (S), Cuttack, arising out
of Mahila P.S. Case No.43 of 2025.

4. Perused the copies of the final form submitted
under Sections 85/296/115(2)/351(2)/316(2) of BNS
read with Section 4 of the D.P Act.

Page 1 of 2

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel that this
is a case of false implication and dispute has been
given the colour of criminality. Hence, the Petitioner
may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

6. Learned counsels for the State and the
Informant oppose such prayer.

7. This Court perused the statement of the
Informant as well as other statements.

8. Taking note of the same and filing of the final
form as noted above, it is directed that in the event
the Petitioner surrenders before the learned Court in
seisin in the aforesaid case within three weeks hence,
he shall be released on bail on such terms and
conditions as deemed just and proper.

9. Additionally, it is directed that the Petitioner
shall not in any way try to intimidate the Informant
and/or her family members. It shall be open to the
informant/prosecution to seek variance of this order
in the event there is any threat perception.

10. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)
Judge

PKS

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: PRADEEP KUMAR SWAIN
Designation: Assistant Registrar-cum-Senior Secretary
Reason: Authentication
Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack
Date: 17-Jun-2025 19:01:42

Page 2 of 2



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here