Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Pawan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27680) on 23 June, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:27680]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7346/2025
Pawan S/o Shri Mogji, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sagwadia Ps
Gadhi District Banswara Rajasthan (At Present Lodged In District
Jail Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7347/2025
Vinayak S/o Shri Bhagwati, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Gadha
Harengji Ps Nithaua District Dungarpur Rajasthan (At Present
Lodged In District Jail Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7349/2025
Rajendra S/o Shri Dhulji, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Sundni Ps
Lahoria District Banswara Rajsthan (At Present Lodged In District
Jail Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7350/2025
Jayesh @ Jacky S/o Shri Rajendra, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Rohida Ps Loharia District Banswara Rajasthan (At Present
Lodged In District Jail Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Purohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA
(VACATION JUDGE)
Order
23/06/2025
1. The present bail applications have been preferred by the
petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) in
connection with FIR No.148/2025 registered at Police Station
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:38:25 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27680] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7346/2025]
Kotwali, District Banswara for the offences punishable under
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further
submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial
quantity. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long
and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed
that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
applications.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.).
5. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 of
BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) are allowed and it is directed that
petitioners (1) Pawan S/o Mogji, (2) Vinayak S/o (3) Bhagwati,
Rajendra S/o Dhulji and (4) Jayesh @ Jacky S/o Rajendra shall be
released on bail in connection with FIR No. 148/2025 of Police
Station Kotwali, District Banswara provided they execute a
personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sound and solvent
sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial
Court for their appearance before that court on each and every
date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the
completion of the trial.
(CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA (VACATION JUDGE)),J
105-108–Jatin/-
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:38:25 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)