, the present LPA No. 211 of 2021 has been presented.
4. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants Mr. Y.V. Giri submitted that from the inception in the
year 2007 till date, the appellants are continued to hold various
posts on contract basis. Having regard to the length of contract
service, they are entitled for regularization. In support of such
contention, learned senior counsel for the appellants relied on
Annexure – 4 to the writ petition dated 23.10.2006. It is in respect
of sanction of post, relying on government decision in respect of
similarly contract appointees who have been extended the benefit
of pay scale. On 16.07.2008 the State of Bihar and Government of
India have evolved various schemes to the extent that such of
those contract appointees are entitled for regularization. To
buttress the aforementioned contention, learned senior counsel for
the appellants is relying on the Hon’ble Supreme Court decision
namely in the case of Jaggo vs. Union of India and Others with
Anita and Others vs. Union of India and Others reported in 2024
Patna High Court L.P.A No.211 of 2021 dt.16-04-2025
SCC OnLine SC 3826, Paragraph Nos. 22 and 25. Similarly, in
the case of Shripal and Another vs. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad
reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 221, Paragraph No. 15.
[ad_1]
Source link