Patna High Court – Orders
Pramendra Gond @ Parmendra Gond vs The State Of Bihar on 13 August, 2025
Author: Alok Kumar Sinha
Bench: Alok Kumar Sinha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52666 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- Karvandiya District- Rohtas
======================================================
Pramendra Gond @ Parmendra Gond S/O Late Dev Gond @ Dew Goud R/O
Village- Basantpur, P.S.- Sasaram (Karwandia), District- Rohtas at Sasaram
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Karwandiya P.S. Case No.29 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2),
190, 109, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1) & 352 of the BNS.
3. In paragraph-3 of the bail application the learned
counsel for the petitioner has disclosed the criminal antecedent
of the petitioner which is as follows:
“1. Sessions Trial No. 152 of 2017, Arising out
of Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2017,
under sections 379, 411, 413 & 414 of the
Indian Penal Code,
2. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 401 of 2018,
under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 & 447 of
the Indian Penal Code,
3. Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 727 of 2019, under
section 379 of the Indian Penal Code,
4. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52666 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025
2/4under section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
5. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 287 of 2020,
under section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
6. Excise (Sasaram) P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021,
under section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
7. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 122 of 2022,
under sections 413 & 414 of the Indian Penal
Code,
8. Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 117 of 2022, under
section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
9. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2022, under
section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
10. Chand P.S. Case No. 119 of 2020, under
section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
11. Durgawati P.S. Case No. 07 of 2019, under
sections 414 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code and
section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
12. Chainpur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2022, under
section 30 (a) of the Excise Act,
13. Chandauli (U.P.) P.S. Case No. 227 of 2023,
under sections 411, 413, 419 & 420 of the
Indian Penal Code,
14. Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 322 of 2025,
under sections 127(1), 115(2), 109 & 132 of the
B.N.S, and section 27 of the Arms Act, in most
cases he is on bail, except last case, which is
pending before this Hon’ble Court.”
4. The case of the prosecution is that the informant
gave his fardbeyan to the SHO, Karwandiya P.S. on 07.04.2025
alleging therein that on 06.04.2025 at 09:00 PM, the petitioner
and his friend, namely, Shudhir Kumar while coming from
Karwandiya to Wajirganj, in the meantime at Wajirganj More all
named accused persons including the petitioner and 4-5
unknown persons having countrymade pistol and sword were
waiting there. It is further alleged that the petitioner got down
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52666 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025
3/4
from black pulsar (motorcycle) and on the point of pistol asked
about his brother Dilipwa and started assaulting. The petitioner
is said to have assaulted by sword on the head of the informant,
which hit the ear of the informant resulting in the ear getting
cut. Sudhir received head injury and thereafter fled away.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
although the petitioner is named in the FIR, but he is innocent
and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. He further
submits that he has been unnecessarily dragged due to previous
enmity as well as dirty village politics. Learned counsel for the
petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since
30.04.2025. Charge sheet has been filed and as per the injury
report the injury has been stated to be simple, caused by hard
and blunt substance. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the
petitioner be granted regular bail.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer for grant of bail
and submits that taking into account the criminal antecedents of
the petitioner, it is clear that the petitioner is a habitual offender
and enlarging him on bail would be a threat to the civil society.
Learned APP further submits that there is allegation in the FIR
of petitioner having assaulted by sword on the head of the
informant, which could have been very fatal.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52666 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025
4/4
7. Considering the fact that the petitioner has fourteen
criminal antecedents and further considering the fact that the
petitioner has been alleged to have assaulted by sword on the
head of the informant, which could have prove to be very fatal, I
am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the bail
application will be rejected.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Prakash Narayan
U T
[ad_1]
Source link
