Pramod Kumar vs Seetha Baiju on 14 July, 2025

0
42

[ad_1]

This appeal has been preferred by the complainant in C.C.

No.294/2011 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court, Ramankary. After the trial of the said case, the learned

Magistrate found the accused guilty of the offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short

“N.I. Act”), and she was convicted and sentenced to undergo

simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay

Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.

2.​ However, subsequently, the accused preferred an appeal.

The learned Sessions Judge, Alappuzha, vide judgment dated

26.03.2014 in Crl. Appeal No.492/2013, set aside the judgment

passed by the learned Magistrate and acquitted the accused.

Challenging the said judgment of acquittal rendered in the

above-said case, the complainant approached this Court with the

present appeal. The parties in this appeal hereinafter be referred

to as the complainant and the accused for clarity.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here