Pramod Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 8 August, 2025

0
2


Patna High Court – Orders

Pramod Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 8 August, 2025

Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha

Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55318 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Pramod Kumar S/o Brahmadev Singh R/O Village- Tilari, P.S.- Neemchak
                 Bathani, District-Gaya.                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Syed Asgher Najmi, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-08-2025

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is not named in F.I.R. and

apprehending his arrest in connection with Neemchak Bathani

P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307,

333, 353, 337, 338, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per case of the prosecution, on 16.03.2024 at

about 5.10 hours, the informant alongwith police team had

gone to raid accused of Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.

48/2024 at Chandachak Ghat near Paimar river, for

supervision of the sand seized in the said case, however,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55318 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025
2/3

when they reached there, the accused persons surrounded

raiding party and assaulted them with iron rod, lathi, danda

and brick etc. causing injuries to the informant and

constables. The local people disclosed the name of accused

persons, who alleged to be Sand Mafia.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not named in the

FIR and his name transpires during the course of investigation

only on the basis of suspicion. It is submitted that all injuries

received by injured persons are simple in nature caused by

hard and blunt substance and, moreover, the several similarly

alleged named co-accused persons were granted anticipatory

bail by one of the learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court

through Cr. Misc. No. 65629 of 2024 dated 01.10.2024.

Petitioner found involved in one more criminal case of

different nature, where he is on bail.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and

circumstances and by taking note of fact as several named co-

accused persons as mentioned aforesaid granted anticipatory
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55318 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025
3/3

bail by one of the learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court,

accordingly, considering judicial parity, above named

petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order,

is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya/concerned Court, where the case is

pending in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.

50 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here