Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Pravat Mukherjee @ Bappa & Anr vs Unknown on 20 January, 2025
Author: Arijit Banerjee
Bench: Arijit Banerjee
20.01.2025 Item no. 17. Court No.29. AB (Allowed) CRM (DB) 3871 of 2024 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with New Town Police Station Case No.156 of 2022 Dated 29.06.2022 under Sections 366A/370/370A/372/109/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4/5/6/9 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 and Sections 4/6/16/17 of the POCSO Act and Section 81 of the Juvenile Justice Act And In the matter of : Pravat Mukherjee @ Bappa & Anr. ......Petitioners. Mr. Anshuman Chakraborty, Mr. S. S. Saha ......for the Petitioners. Mr. Saryati Dutta, Mr. Akash Ganguly ......for the State. Ms. Jhuma Sen, Ms. Arpita De ......for the Victim Girl. Dictated by Apurba Sinha Ray, J.
1. The petitioners claim that they are in custody for about
two years and six months. The prosecution has failed to
comply with the direction of this Court to complete the
trial of this case within six months from 09.02.2024.
There is no chance of an early conclusion of the trial
since only 6 out of 18 charge sheet named witnesses
have been examined.
2. Learned Counsel for the victim girl has raised strong
objection to the prayer of bail. According to her, there
are sufficient incriminating materials against the
Signed By :
APURBA
BANDYOPADHYAY
High Court of
Calcutta
20 th of January
2025 05:52:29 PM
2present petitioners as per the deposition of one minor
victim girl.
3. Learned Advocate for the State also opposes the prayer
for bail. He has drawn our attention to the order dated
22.07.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench directing the
prosecution to conclude the trial of the case within one
year. That time has not yet elapsed and as such, the
prosecution has opportunity to complete the trial within
the time limit prescribed in the order dated 22.07.2024.
4. We have considered the materials on record. We find
that the petitioners are in custody for about two years
and six months. The fundamental right of an under-trial
to personal liberty and speedy trial cannot be
overemphasized and the delay in trial caused cannot be
attributed to the present petitioners. Considering all the
aspects and the recent decisions of the Hon’ble Apex
Court, we are inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail
on certain conditions.
5. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioners, namely
PRAVAT MUKHERJEE @ BAPPA & BISWAJIT
CHAKRABORTY shall be released on bail upon
furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-each, with two sureties
of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the
satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under
the POCSO Act at Barasat, North 24 Parganas, and on
further conditions that they shall not enter the districts
3
of North 24 Parganas and South 24 Parganas except for
attending the court proceedings and shall provide the
address where they shall presently reside to the Officer
in Charge of the New Town Police Station as well as
learned Trial Court and shall meet the Officer in Charge
of the concerned police station within whose jurisdiction
they shall presently reside once in a week until further
orders.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the trial court on
every date of hearing until further orders and shall not
intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence
and/or commit any cognizable offence in any manner
whatsoever.
7. In the event the petitioners fail to adhere to any of the
conditions stipulated above without justifiable cause,
the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the
petitioners’ bail in accordance with law without further
reference to this Court.
8. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
4
[ad_1]
Source link