Prema Gopal vs Central Adoption Resource Authority on 29 January, 2025

0
54

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Prema Gopal vs Central Adoption Resource Authority on 29 January, 2025

     ITEM NO.41                               COURT NO.8                   SECTION XII

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                     No(s).      14886/2024

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-04-2024
     in WPC No. 33803/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Madras]

     PREMA GOPAL                                                            Petitioner(s)
                                                     VERSUS

     CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AUTHORITY & ORS.                             Respondent(s)

     [ TO BE TAKEN UP AT 2 P.M. ]
     FOR ADMISSION and I.R.
     IA No. 147703/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT

Date : 29-01-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Anil Malhotra, Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Malhotra, Adv.

Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR
Mr. Ankit Malhotra, Adv.

Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv.

Mr. Rishabh Mathur, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. R Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv.
Shubham Saxena, Adv.

Shivika Mehra, Adv.

Astha Singh, Adv.

Advitiya Awasthi, Adv.

Abhijeet Singh, Adv.

Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR

Ms. G. Indira, AOR
Ms. Gandeepan, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Signature Not Verified
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner,
Digitally signed by
NEETU SACHDEVA
Date: 2025.01.30
16:56:03 IST
Reason: learned ASG appearing for respondent no.1 and Smt. G.Indira

for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and perused the voluminous

contd..

– 2 –

material that has been appended to the memorandum of the

Special Leave Petition.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is a citizen of United Kingdom (UK), who

has adopted two minor children (twins) on 09.01.2020 vide

Annexures P-1 and P-2 appended to the Special Leave Petition.

He further submitted that the said adoption of the two minor

children was further incorporated by a Deed of Adoption dated

19.09.2022 (Annexures P-4 and P-5), which clearly indicate

that the physical act of giving and taking of both the twin

children in adoption was performed on 09.01.2020 along with

the performance of the Hindu religious ceremonies in the

presence of relatives and friends, which is also supported by

Annexure P-1/Invitation.

Learned counsel submitted that having regard to Section

16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (for

short, “the HAMA, 1956”), there is a presumption as to

registered documents relating to adoption.

Since the petitioner herein is a citizen of UK, the

procedure for adoption of children under the HAMA, 1956 by

parents who desire to relocate the child abroad, as envisaged

under Chapter VIII of the Adoption Regulations, 2022

(“Regulations, 2022”) has to be followed.

In this regard, our attention was drawn to Regulations

64 and 67 of the Regulations, 2022, which read as under –

“64. This Chapter shall apply to — (a) all adoption
cases under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act,
contd..

– 3 –

1956 (78 of 1956) by prospective adoptive parents or
adoptive parents residing outside the country and

(b) all adoption cases pertaining to countries
outside the Hague Adoption Convention.

67. Procedure in the case of registered adoption
deed.― (1) In the cases where the adoption deed has
already been executed in pursuance of adoption under
the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (78 of
1956), before the commencement of the Adoption
(Amendment) Regulations, 2021, the requisite
documents supporting the facts of the adoption deed
shall be duly verified and recommended by the
District Magistrate in the format as provided in
Schedule XXXV.

(2) On receipt of the verification of documents as
per Schedule XXXV, the Central Adoption Resource
Authority shall comply with the provisions of
Articles 5 or 17 from the receiving country as
provided in the Hague Adoption Convention.

(3) Upon receiving such certificate, the Central
Adoption Resource Authority shall issue no objection
certificate for Hague ratified countries and in cases
of countries outside the Hague Convention on
Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of
Inter-country Adoption, the Central Adoption Resource
Authority shall issue a support letter upon receiving
a letter accepting the said adoption from the
Government department.”

Learned counsel submitted that although the adoption of

the twin children in the instant case took place on

09.01.2020, the Deed of Adoption was subsequently registered

on 19.09.2022. He submitted that the said Deed of Adoption

would relate back to 09.01.2020, on which date the religious

ceremonies were performed in the presence of relatives and

friends for the formal adoption of the children under the

provisions of the HAMA, 1956. In the circumstances, Regulation

67 has to be read in a manner relatable to the date of

contd..

– 4 –

adoption. The submission of learned counsel was that

although the Deed of Adoption was registered on

19.09.2022 which is subsequent to the commencement of the

Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021, the said Deed of

Adoption relates back to the date of adoption being

09.01.2020. In the circumstances, there can be no hurdle in

the consideration of the case of the petitioner herein under

Regulation 67 of the Regulations, 2022. Therefore, he urged

that initially a direction may be issued to respondent

no.3/Collector, and respondent no.2 as well, for the purpose

of consideration of the case under Regulation 67 of the

Regulations, 2022.

Per contra, learned ASG appearing for respondent

No.1/Central Adoption Resource Authority contended that this

is a case of inter-country adoption and therefore, the

procedure as envisaged under the Regulations for inter country

adoption must be strictly complied with. In this regard, our

attention was drawn to Regulations 67 and 68 of the

Regulations, 2022 as well.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3

submitted that if any direction is to be issued to respondent

nos.2 and 3, the same would be complied with in accordance

with law.

We are prima facie of the view that the learned counsel

for the petitioner is right in his submissions.

In the circumstances, we direct respondent no.3/Collector

contd…

– 5 –

and respondent no.2 to entertain the application to be filed

by the petitioner herein with all supporting documents, within

a period of one week of from today.

On receipt of the said application, respondent nos.3 and

2 shall consider the case of the petitioner herein having

regard to the relevant provisions of the Regulations, 2022 and

in accordance with law bearing in mind the fact that the

adoption took place on 09.01.2020.

Liberty is reserved to the petitioner herein to seek

right of hearing before respondent no.3 either in person or

through her representative or counsel.

It is needless to observe that if such a request is made

by the petitioner for an opportunity of hearing to her or her

representative or counsel, the same shall be accorded by

respondent no.3/Collector.

The entire exercise shall be completed by respondent

nos.3 and 2 within a period of two weeks from the date of

hearing of the petitioner.

A copy of the order of respondent no. 3 to be submitted

before this Court by respondent no.3 herein.

List on 05.03.2025.

(NEETU SACHDEVA)                                           (DIVYA BABBAR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here