Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Priyanshi Surana D/O Naresh Surana vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 17 January, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:2415]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10442/2024
Ashok Kumar Yadav S/o Mohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o Village Sundarpura, Post Beelpur, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical,
Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution,
Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur
4. The Superintendent, SMS Hospital, Jaipur.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11187/2024
Ram Gopal Dhaker S/o Kailash Chand Dhaker, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Tara Pipli, Thukrai, Tehsil Begun, District Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan.
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical,
Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution,
Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Udaipur
Zone, Udaipur.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Office, Chittorgarh.
—-Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11188/2024
Chitra Suman D/o Prem Chandra Suman, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Mali Mohalla, Near Khari Bawdi, Atru, District Baran,
Rajasthan.
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical,
Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution,
Jaipur.
(Downloaded on 22/01/2025 at 10:07:38 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:2415] (2 of 3) [CW-10442/2024]
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran.
5. The Principal Medical Officer, Sub District Hospital Atru,
District Baran.
—-Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11250/2024
Priyanshi Surana D/o Naresh Surana, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Regar Mohalla, Singoli, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara,
Rajasthan.
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical,
Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution,
Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Jaipur
4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Udaipur
Zone, Udaipur.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Chittorgarh.
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with
Mr. Prakhar Jain
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
17/01/2025
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed
reliance upon judgment dated 12.12.2024 passed in Hakimuddin
vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. registered as S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.14393/2024, and submitted that the said petition
was decided in favor of the petitioners therein, thence the same
ratio can be made applicable herein.
(Downloaded on 22/01/2025 at 10:07:38 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:2415] (3 of 3) [CW-10442/2024]
2. Further, learned counsel has submitted that in the said
petition it was opined that despite the fact that the petitioners
therein were not registered with Rajasthan State Allied and
Healthcare Council RSA & HC (RPMC) during their experience
period, however if they have performed an equivalent duty, they
will be entitled for the grant of experience for the said period.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents Shri Archit Bohra, AGC
has not refuted the aforementioned contentions however has
apprised the Court with the fact that the said judgment dated
12.12.2024 is assailed and an appeal is preferred against the
same, however, till date no interim protection is made operative.
4. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the
instant matter and considering the consensus drawn inter-se the
parties, this Court deems it apposite to allow the instant petitions
in terms of the ratio encapsulated in Hakimuddin (Supra).
5. In view of the above, the instant petitions are allowed.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/s-344, 346-347, 349
(Downloaded on 22/01/2025 at 10:07:38 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link