Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Pudhota Rajesh, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 April, 2025
Sl.No.37 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.3484 OF 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. OFFICE DATE ORDER No. NOTE 02.04.2025 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arraigned as A.5 in C.C. No.57 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, for the alleged offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 21(ii) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 3 read with Sections 181, 5 and 180, section 146 read with section 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 3. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the jeep and has no connection with the alleged crime. It is submitted that the investigating officer and the complainant are one and the same and that on the complaint of the investigating officer, the police have registered the F.I.R., investigated into 2 CRL.P. No.3484 of 2025 and subsequently filed charge sheet. 4. Considering the same, there shall be stay of appearance of the petitioner/A.5 in C.C.No.57 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, except on the dates when his presence is required as directed by the learned Magistrate. 5. Issue notice to the 2nd respondent.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner is
permitted to serve personal notice on the
2nd respondent by registered post with
acknowledgement due and file proof of
service.
7. Post on 06.05.2025.
____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH.N
BV
[ad_1]
Source link