[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Raja Babu Sah @ Raja Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 3 July, 2025
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5310 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2017 Thana- SC/ST District- Begusarai
======================================================
RAJA BABU SAH @ RAJA SAH Son of Rajo Sah @ Rajo Singh Resident of
Village- Bariyarpur Paschimi, Ward No.4, Police Station- Khodawandpur,
District- Begusarai.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar , Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 03-07-2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order
dated 25.09.2019 passed in a case registered for the offence
punishable under sections 376/ 511 , 448 , 504/4 of the Indian
Penal Code and sections 3(i)(w) (s) ( r ) of the Scheduled Castes
and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby
the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been
rejected.
3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely
Seema Devi alleged that on 27.01.2017 at about 3:00 AM in the
night, this appellant entered in the house of informant and called
her by caste name and after putting towel in her mouth
attempted to commit rape with her and upon hulla , appellant
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5310 of 2019(5) dt.03-07-2025
2/2
managed to fled away from there . It is further alleged that when
husband of informant went to made complaint about the
incident, he was abused by caste name .
4. It is submitted that appellant is quite innocent and
has committed no offence as alleged. F.I.R. has been lodged
after the delay of 2 days for which there is no plausible
explanation . It is further submitted that both the parties are
neighbours and due to petty dispute , this false and concocted
case has been lodged against this appellant. Appellant claims
clean antecedent.
5 . Learned special Public Prosecutor for the State
opposed the bail and submitted that there is specific allegation
against this appellant that he committed rape with the victim and
also abused by caste name .
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I do not find any
reason to interfere with the impugned order, accordingly this
appeal is dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link
