Patna High Court – Orders
Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava vs The State Of Bihar on 10 June, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Sinha
Bench: Anil Kumar Sinha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6160 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2022 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya
======================================================
1. Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava S/O Babu Chand Yadav Resident of
Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya,
2. Santu Kumar @ Santu Yadav S/o Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava
Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya,
3. Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar S/o Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava
Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya,
4. Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Yadav S/O Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava
Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya,
5. Sinki Yadav @ Sinki Kumari W/O Santu Yadav @ Santu Kumar Resident of
Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya,
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
3 10-06-2025
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out
of Belaganj Police Station Case No. 194 of 2022,
disclosing offences punishable under Sections
147/148/149/341/323/ 324/307/379/448/504 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report,
is that on 06.05.2022, at about 11 AM, the petitioners,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6160 of 2025(3) dt.10-06-2025
2/3
along with other co-accused persons, started digging the
public lane and when the informant protested, all the
accused persons abused him and the petitioner no. 1
assaulted him by means of garasa, due to which he
sustained head injury. The petitioner no. 2 assaulted the
daughter-in-law on her hand, co-accused Mantu Yadav
assaulted Keshami Devi and snatched her gold locket and
ear-ring, the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 assaulted the
grandson of the informant and the petitioner no. 5
assaulted one Usha Devi by brick.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated
in this case due to land dispute. He further submits that
both the parties are agnates and there was a dispute with
regard to the passage between the parties. He further
submits that five persons, including the informant, have
sustained injuries, but all are simple in nature caused by
hard and blunt substance.
5. Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf
of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that
both the parties are angates, there appears to be previous
land dispute between the parties and the injuries sustained
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6160 of 2025(3) dt.10-06-2025
3/3
by the informant and others are simple in nature, I am
inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory
bail.
6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their
arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period
of four weeks from today, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each
with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj Police
Station Case No. 194 of 2022, subject to the condition
laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √ T √