Patna High Court – Orders
Rajbanshi Rai @ Rajbanshi Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 25 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51189 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
======================================================
1. Rajbanshi Rai @ Rajbanshi Yadav son of Yogindra Rai @ Yogender Ray
Village- Baswariya Ps -Chiraiya District -East Champaran
2. Sanjay Rai Son of Late Bhola Rai Village- Baswariya Ps -Chiraiya District
-East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 25-07-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with
Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024 instituted for the offences
under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 504, 506/34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution story, in short, is that the accused
persons assaulted the informant and his nephew with deadly
weapons over a sewerage dispute due to which they sustained
injuries. It is also alleged that during the assault, a gold chain
was also snatched.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51189 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025
2/2
petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that general and
omnibus allegation has been made against these petitioners. No
specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. As per the
injury report, one injury is simple in nature and one injury is
grievous in nature. It has been submitted on behalf of the
petitioners that the petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent
whereas petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case, there being no direct allegation against the
petitioners as also the period of custody undergone by the
petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case
No. 18 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link