Rakesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 June, 2025

0
4

Patna High Court – Orders

Rakesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 June, 2025

Author: Anil Kumar Sinha

Bench: Anil Kumar Sinha

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11848 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Kumar S/O Shivjee Prasad Resident Of Village- Konhwa, P.S.-
                 Gopalganj, Dist.- Gopalganj.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    Sandhya Kumari W/O Rakesh Kumar, D/O Chandrama Singh R/at Vill.-
                 Mahuari Purab Tola, P.S.-Siwan Muffasil, Dist.- Siwan.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, App.
                 For the Informant        :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   11-06-2025

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel

for the complainant-Opposite Party No. 2 and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 347 of 2024, registered for

the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504,

506, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and

4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, O.P. No. 2 solemnized

marriage with the petitioner on 12.06.2022, during which

her family gave Rs. 7 lakh in cash and other gifts worth

Rs. 6 lakh. At the time of vidai, petitioner and his father
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11848 of 2025(4) dt.11-06-2025
2/4

demanded a Scorpio car and Rs. 3 lakh as additional

dowry. Although the vidai proceeded after the

intervention of community members, O.P. No. 2 was later

subjected to physical and mental torture for not fulfilling

the demand. Petitioner allegedly insulted her appearance

and claimed he preferred his sister-in-law. On 28.04.2024

at 10 PM, it is alleged that petitioner and his relatives

attempted to burn her by pouring kerosene on her. She

managed to save herself and was expelled from her

matrimonial home, with her belongings taken away.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner

alleged and he has falsely been implicated in this case.

However, without prejudice to the right and contention of

the petitioner, and in order to maintain harmony in the

family, the petitioner is ready and willing to pay a sum of

Rs. 3,000/- per month to the Opposite Party No. 2 as

living cost, subject to the final outcome of the present

case as well as the matrimonial case, if any, pending

and/or decided between the parties.

5. Learned Counsel for the complainant-Opposite Party No.

2 accepts the offer so made by learned Counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11848 of 2025(4) dt.11-06-2025
3/4

petitioner and submits that the petitioner may be directed

to deposit the said amount of Rs. 3,000/- per month in the

bank account of the complainant-Opposite Party No. 2,

details of which shall be furnished by learned Counsel for

the Opposite Party No. 2 to learned Counsel for the

petitioner within ten days from today.

6. After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the materials on record and the

fact that the offer made by learned Counsel for the

petitioner has been accepted by learned Counsel for the

Opposite Party No. 2, I am inclined to grant the petitioner

privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a

period of six weeks from today, be released on bail, upon

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in

connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 347 of

2024

9. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11848 of 2025(4) dt.11-06-2025
4/4

deposit a sum of Rs. 3,000/- per month in the bank

account of Opposite Party No. 2, staring from 10th July,

2025.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here