Ramanna vs R Vittala Murthy on 4 April, 2025

0
55

Appellant has filed this appeal u/s 374(3) of Code of

Criminal Procedure assailing the judgment of conviction and

order of sentence passed in C.C.No.1475/2019 dated

28.04.2022 on the file of IV Addl. Judge, Court of Small

Causes and Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru

(SCCH-6).

2. Rank of the parties is referred to as per their

ranks assigned before the trial court.

3 Crl.A.No.627/2022

3. The facts of the case leading to this appeal may

be summarized as under;

The respondent herein is the complainant before the

trial court. Accused approached the complainant and

availed credit facility to the tune of Rs.3,00,000/- in the

year 2016 by executing a pronote and consideration receipt

on 10.06.2016 in his favour with an assurance that he will

repay the said amount in short duration, thereafter accused

repaid a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant and

subsequently issued a cheque bearing No.070025 dated

20.11.2018 for a sum of Rs.2,40,000/- drawn on Syndicate

Bank, Malleshwaram Branch, Bengaluru, upon its

presentation the same was dishonoured on 13.12.2018 with

a reason of “Account Dormant”. Therefore, complainant

issued a statutory notice on 11.01.2019 calling upon the

accused to make repayment of his loan amount which was

returned as not claimed, which amounts to deemed service,

despite the same, accused neither chosen to pay the

cheque amount nor replied to the legal notice, thereby

committed an offence punishable u/s 138 of N.I. Act.

After compliance of the ingredients of Section 138 of N.I.Act

complaint is filed. The trial court took cognizance and after

going through the materials on record, found the prima

facie case against accused for an offence punishable u/s

138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, registered criminal case

and issued summons to the accused.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here