Ramesh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025

Patna High Court – Orders

Ramesh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53003 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ramesh Yadav S/O Sivadhar Yadav R/O Village- Mahuli, P.S- Ara Muffasil,
                  Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar).
           2.    Umesh Yadav S/O Sivadhar Yadav R/O Village- Mahuli, P.S- Ara Muffasil,
                 Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar).
           3.    Ram Pukar Yadav @ Ram Preet Yadav S/O Sivadhar Yadav R/O Village-
                 Mahuli, P.S- Ara Muffasil, Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar).
           4.     Dhanji Yadav S/O Umesh Yadav R/O Village- Mahuli, P.S- Ara Muffasil,
                  Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar).
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.

Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323,

324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a

copy of the order impugned is being submitted in the Court and

from perusal of the same, it would manifest that the learned

Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Bhojpur at Ara has corrected

the date of signing as 09.09.2024. The order impugned is taken

on record, as such, the defect, as pointed out by the office, is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53003 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025
2/4

hereby ignored.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant

alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners came,

abused and assaulted the side of the informant including his son

by means of deadly weapons on account of which they sustained

injuries. It is further submitted that petitioners are innocent and

have committed no offence at all. It is next submitted that

petitioners and the informant are neighbours. It is also submitted

that as per FIR, there is specific allegation against Umesh Yadav

(petitioner no. 2), Ramesh Yadav (petitioner no. 1) and Ram

Pukar Yadav (petitioner no. 3) to assault the informant causing

injury on his head. Further, they also assaulted Munna Yadav

when he was trying to help the son of the informant, namely,

Abhishek Yadav who was also assaulted and had fallen on the

ground.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners submits that no reason for the occurrence has been

assigned. It is further submitted that even allegation of assault is

not specific rather all the accused have been alleged to have

assaulted the injured. It is next submitted that the injury suffered

by the injured is simple in nature, except that of informant but
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53003 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025
3/4

then though the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted but

allegation of assault is not specific. It is also submitted that

petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the

investigation to prove their innocence. It is submitted that co-

accused Surendra Yadav had approached this Court seeking

anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 77619 of 2024 and the

same was allowed by a learend Coordinate Bench of this Court

vide order dated 20.11.2024.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in

the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial

court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ara

Mufassil P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024, subject to the conditions as

laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, if the investigating officer of the case

files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53003 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025
4/4

notice that the petitioners despite giving assurance to this Court

are not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court

shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T