Ramij Raja vs Unknown on 11 August, 2025

0
2


Heard the submissions of both the learned advocates for

the parties.

2. Perused the case diary and the statements made by

various witnesses under Section 180 of BNSS as well as

the contents of FIR and the role attributed by the

petitioner, who is aged about 20 years. It is also

submitted that the investigation has culminated in filing

of the charge sheet and warrant of arrest has been issued

and the next date is fixed for ER of WA. At this stage in

view of the above and in absence of any such specific

overt act against the present petitioner, more so, charge

sheet has been submitted, custodial interrogation of the

petitioner is not necessary.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here