Ramprit Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025

0
3

Patna High Court – Orders

Ramprit Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025

Author: Anshuman

Bench: Anshuman

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51523 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2021 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ramprit Ram S/o Late Ramvrich Ram Resident of village - Bakhari, P.s.-
                  Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran
           2.    Vinod Ram S/o Ramprit Ram Resident of village - Bakhari, P.S.- Rajepur,
                 Distt.- East Champaran
           3.     Kishor Ram S/o Ramprit Ram Resident of village - Bakhari, P.S.- Rajepur,
                  Distt.- East Champaran
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-08-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioners who apprehend arrest in connection

with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2021 lodged on 15.11.2021,

for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 150,

151, 152, 171, 341, 342, 323, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353,

120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, the F.I.R. has been lodged

against 42 named accused persons and 100-150 unknown

accused persons. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that during the

election, the informant received information that a person, after

casting his vote, had taken a photograph and was showing it to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51523 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3

other, thereby attempting to compromise the confidentiality of

the election. Thereafter, both such persons were taken out of the

election centre, and the process to seize their mobile phones was

initiated. In the meantime, 40-50 people, armed with lathis and

dandas, arrived and freed both persons, also taking away the

mobile phone. Subsequently, when attempts were made to arrest

the said persons, 80-90 additional accused persons, variously

armed, arrived and attacked with the intention to kill, causing

injuries to several police personnel.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are innocent and has committed no offence. The

accusation against him is general, vague, and omnibus in nature.

The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R., but in a mob of 100-

150 people, their names, parentage, and addresses have been

disclosed by someone else due to political rivalry. The

petitioners have not participated in the alleged crime, and except

for mere suspicion, there is no material to indicate their

complicity in the alleged offence. Learned counsel further

submits that several co-accused persons have been granted bail

by different co-ordinate Benches vide orders dated 08.04.2022,

11.05.2022, 14.11.2022, 19.10.2023, 29.11.2023, 19.03.2025

and 07.05.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15421 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51523 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3

2022, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15678 of 2022; Criminal

Miscellaneous No. 11859 of 2022; Criminal Miscellaneous No.

26915 of 2022; Criminal Miscellaneous No. 67081/2023;

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 76999/2023, Criminal

Miscellaneous No. 11996 of 2025 and Criminal Miscellaneous

No. 28504/2025. However, the petitioner is accused in one more

criminal case, but in that case, he has been granted bail.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

bail.

6. In the facts and circumstances, let the above named

petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today,

on furnishing bail bond of ₹30000/- (thirty thousand) each as

mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023 to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate-1st

Class, Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with

Rajepur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2021, subject to the conditions as

laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-

U     T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here