[ad_1]
1. The present common judgment shall determine the
aforenoted criminal revision petitions, preferred in terms of the
provisions under Section(s) 397/399 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C./Code’),
bearing; Cr. Rev. No. 19/2022, Cr. Rev. No. 261/2022, Cr. Rev.
No. 262/2022 and Cr. Rev. 544/2022. Pertinently, Cr. Rev. No.
19/2022, Cr. Rev. No. 261/2022, and Cr. Rev. No. 262/2022 have
been preferred by accused namely, Nakul Chand ( hereinafter
referred to as ‘Nakul Chand’); accused, namely, Pankaj Bajaj
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Pankaj Bajaj’) and accused, namely,
Rashmi Bajaj (hereinafter referred to as ‘Rashmi Bajaj’;
hereinafter the said accused persons are collectively referred to as
the ‘accused persons’), respectively. In contrast, Cr. Rev.
544/2022 has been preferred by Meenakshi Sharma ( hereinafter
referred to as the ‘complainant’). Appositely, the said revision
petitions emanate/impugn a common order dated 06.12.2021
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned order’), passed by learned
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01/Ld. ACMM-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Court ( hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld.
ACMM/Ld. Trial Court’), in case bearing, ‘State v. Pankaj Bajaj
& Ors., Case No. 298098/2016″, arising out of FIR No. 234/2011,
CR No. 19/2022 Nakul Chand v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Ors.
CR No. 261/2022. Pankaj Bajaj v. State (GNCT of Delhi).
CR No. 262/2022 Rashmi Bajaj v. State (GNCT of Delhi).
[ad_2]
Source link