Ratan Saha vs The Ministry Of Railways And Anr on 10 March, 2025

0
5

Calcutta High Court

Ratan Saha vs The Ministry Of Railways And Anr on 10 March, 2025

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

OCD -7
                                   ORDER SHEET

                             AP-COM/164/2025

                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                             COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE

                                   RATAN SAHA

                                       VS

                   THE MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ANR.

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
  Date: 10thMarch, 2025.

                                                                    Appearance:
                                                           Mr. Dinesh Pani, Adv.
                                                            .... for the petitioner
                                            Mr. SahasrangshuBhattacharjee, Adv.
                                                            Mr. Rivu Dutta, Adv.
                                                            ...for the respondent

The Court:1.The petitioner prays for appointment of a sole arbitrator

in terms of agreement dated July 23, 2014. The petitioner was engaged as a

Halt Contractor at Takipur Halt Station. The tenure of engagement were

regularly extended by supplementary agreements and ultimately, extension

was granted till February 15, 2025 vide a supplementary agreement dated

September 7, 2022.

On January 3, 2024, the petitioner made a prayer for further

extension. The prayer was refused. A dispute arose. The petitioner approached

the competent Civil Court for an injunction. Ad-interim injunction was granted

and thereafter the application was rejected.

The petitioner invoked the arbitration clause by a notice issued by his learned
2

advocate dated February 10, 2025 and suggested names of four learned

advocates who would act as the sole arbitrator. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned

advocate for the respondent submits that the respondent asked the petitioner

to waive the applicability of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996, in terms of the proviso.

As the petitioner has approached this Court for appointment of

learned arbitrator, it is clear that the petitioner is not willing to accept any

such waiver clause and desires that the Court should refer the dispute to a sole

arbitrator. Mr. Bhattacharjeealso agrees that a sole arbitrator should be

appointed. There is an arbitration clause and the notice invoking arbitration is

available.

2.Under such circumstances, the application is disposed of by

appointing Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee, learned Advocate, Bar Library Club, as the

sole arbitrator, to arbitrate upon the disputes between the parties. The

respondents shall be at liberty to raise all objections that may be available to

them under the law. The learned Arbitrator shall comply with the provisions of

Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The learned Arbitrator

shall be at liberty to fix his remuneration as per the Schedule of Arbitration

and Conciliation Act, 1996.

(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.)
TR/



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here