Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Ravi Kumar S/O Shri Satyaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23159) on 12 June, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:23159]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6006/2025
Ravi Kumar S/o Shri Satyaram, Resident Of Chandarpur, Police
Station Kisni, District Mainpuri, At Present R/o 32 Subhash
Nagar, Albatiya, Shahganj, Police Station Jagdishpura, Agra
(U.P.)
(At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
12/06/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant
was arrested in connection with FIR No. 108/2025 registered at
Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur for the offence(s)
under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 340(2), 336(4) and 60(a) of
B.N.S.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted
that Co-ordinate Bench of the Court under the akin circumstances
and facts has enlarged the accused therein on bail. It is further
submitted that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the
family who is aged approximately 41 years. Further, it is
submitted that matter in hand is triable by Magistrate.
(Downloaded on 16/06/2025 at 09:58:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23159] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6006/2025]
3. Lastly, it is submitted that there are only two criminal
antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, wherein,
bail has been granted in one of the matter.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the bail application and has submitted that criminal
antecedents are registered against the accused-applicant.
5. Having heard and considered the arguments advanced by the
learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that matter
is triable by Magistrate; that the applicant is in custody from
approximately preceding three months; that Co-ordinate Bench
has enlarged the accused therein on bail under akin factual matrix
and circumstances; therefore, considering the overall facts and
circumstances of the case and material on record but without
commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined
to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge
him/her on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of
B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ravi
Kumar S/o Shri Satyaram shall be enlarged on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his
appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing
as and when called upon to do so. Furthermore, taking note of the
criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, as
an extended interpretation of the provisions of ‘community
service’ as enshrined under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, and as a
reformative approach to re-include the accused-applicant back in
the society with a better vision, aim and zeal in life, this court
(Downloaded on 16/06/2025 at 09:58:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23159] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6006/2025]
deems it fit to impose an ancillary condition upon the applicant,
therefore, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall contribute
to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a
period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, on two
hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision
and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with
the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative
authorities concerned.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/123
(Downloaded on 16/06/2025 at 09:58:50 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)