Ravi Soni vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37871) on 21 August, 2025

0
5

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Ravi Soni vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37871) on 21 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:37871]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1678/2025

Ravi Soni S/o Prahlad Soni, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No.
6, Lucky Place Ke Piche, Ward No. 33, Jyoti Nagar Vistar, Dist.
Bhilwara.
                                                                               ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
1.         State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.         Late Shankar Lal Jat S/o Nahar Mal Jat, R/o 31
           Railmangra (Through His Son Madan Lal, Madhav Lal,
           Heera Lal Jat)
                                                                         ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)               :     Mr. S.K. Bhati
                                      Mr. Prakash Banjara & Deepesh
                                      Gurjar
For Respondent(s)               :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, Public
                                      Prosecutor
                                      Mr. J.K. Haniya for complainant



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

21/08/2025

1. It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the petitioner and the legal heirs of the complainant vide

compromise deed dated 08.01.2025 and it is borne out from the

compromise that the Legal heirs of the complainant are not

inclined to proceed further in the matter.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of

Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

3. It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned

compromise, the learned Court below vide order dated

(Downloaded on 26/08/2025 at 09:38:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:37871] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1678/2025]

08.01.2025, has verified the compromise between the parties to

the extent of the offence under Section 420 of IPC. However, the

learned Court below has declined to verify the compromise with

regard to the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 419

of IPC on the ground that the said offences are non-

compoundable.

4. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties as well

as the aforesaid order dated 08.01.2025 of the learned Court

below and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State

of Punjab & Anr. (supra), I deem it just and proper to invoke

inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 of BNSS (482 of

Cr.P.C.).

5. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the

F.I.R. No.147/2022, lodged at Police Station Railmagra, District

Rajsamand and all consequential proceedings for offences under

Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 419 of IPC, against the

petitioner are hereby quashed.

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
199-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 26/08/2025 at 09:38:50 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here