Ravish K.B vs Mohammed Nazeer on 28 July, 2025

0
5

This judgment is the outcome of the final report filed by

the PI of Halsuru Gate Police Station, Bengaluru against the

accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable U/s. 332,

341, 353 and 447 R/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

2. Brief Facts Of The Case Of Prosecution:-

The case of prosecution is that on 19.12.2020 at 12.45

PM while CW1 to CW- 3 were deputed at the entrance gate of

City Civil Court in view of restrictions imposed to avoid

spread of Covid-19 pandemic, accused No.1 and 2 in

furtherance of common intention came on a motor cycle

bearing No. KA-04-KC-3868 and illegally trespassed inside

said entrance gate of City Civil Court despite restraint caused

by CW.1 to CW.3 saying that only advocates are permitted to

enter the court. The accused picked up quarrel with CW.1 to

CW.3 saying that they wants to meet their counsel inside

C.C. No.20463/2020

City Civil Court and wrongfully restrained them, deterred

CW.1 to CW.3 from carrying out their official duty to restrict

entry of general public inside City Civil Court in view of

Covid-19 guidelines and with common intention Accused

pushed back CW1 and slapped on his face. Further when

CW2 tried to stop them from said act, Accused No. 2 broke

nail of right hand finger of CW.2 and Accused No. 1 pulled

shirt collar of CW3. Thus, Accused No.1 and 2 voluntarily

caused hurt to CW1 to CW.3 public servants with an

intention to deter them from carrying out their official duty

and thereby the accused No.1 and 2 have committed the

offence punishable under Sections 332, 341, 353 and 447

R/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here