Patna High Court
Ravish Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2025
Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3435 of 2022
======================================================
1. Sudhir Kumar Gupta S/o Rajkumar Gupta Resident of Village- Chechariya,
P.S. and P.O.- Nagar Untari, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand.
2. Anuj Kumar Singh S/o Ranjay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Jamalpur,
P.O. and P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
3. Manish Kumar S/o Rajkumar Prasad Resident of Village- Pipra, P.O. and
P.S.- Govindpur, District- Nawada, Bihar.
4. Abhishek Kumar Singh S/o Nand Kishor Singh Resident of Village and
P.O.- Masarh, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
5. Vinay Kumar Choudhary S/o Sanjay Kumar Choudhary Resident of
Village- Selhouri Bag, P.O.- Belhouri, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna,
Bihar.
6. Arjun Kumar Singh S/o Vijay Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Masarh,
P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
7. Sunil Kumar S/o Ramratan Chaudhary Resident of Village- Meyari, P.O.-
Tarwan, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya, Bihar.
8. Vikash Kumar Singh S/o Vijay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Kenari,
P.O.- Itwan, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya, Bihar.
9. Atul Kumar S/o Uday Kant Singh Resident of Village- Mahna, P.O.-
Mahna, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
10. Akash Kumar S/o Arvind Kumar Sharma Resident of Village- Samhariya,
P.O.- Choury, P.S.- Kaler, District- Arwal, Bihar.
11. Pranvendra Raj S/o Radheshyam Upadhyay Resident of Village and P.O.-
Khiriaon, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
12. Manish Kumar S/o Binod Mandal Resident of Village- Auraiya, P.O. and
P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
13. Amar Kumar S/o Akhileshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Narayanpur,
P.O.- Daulatpur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur.
14. Kundan Kumar S/o Baliram Rai Resident of Village- Babhnauli, P.O.-
Manikpur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
15. Bablu Kumar S/o Suresh Mehta Resident of Village- Shahpur Akhada, P.O.
and P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
16. Satyanand Chaurasiya S/o Mahendra Chaurasiya Resident of Village-
Mussi Bira, P.O. and P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad, Bihar.
17. Deepak Kumar S/o Sunil Saw Resident of Village- Nala Road, Panchu
Hisua, P.O. and P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada, Bihar.
18. Raviraj Kumar S/o Chamak Lal Mahto Resident of Village- Toralpur, P.O.-
Mustafapur, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
19. Shashi Kumar S/o Sribhagvan Singh Resident of Village- Baradih, P.O.-
Parasia Thakurai, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
20. Abhishek Kumar S/o Vijay Kumar Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-
Masaurhi, District- Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
2/43
21. Rajnish Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Barahpur, P.O.-
Mor, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna, Bihar.
22. Dheeraj Kumar S/o Bhushan Singh Resident of Village- Madhraptr, P.O.-
Madhraptr, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
23. Abhimanyu Kumar S/o Padarath Saw Resident of Village- Barahpur, P.O.-
Mor, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna, Bihar.
24. Raja Babu S/o Rajeshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Nasirnachak, P.O.-
Barni, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna, Bihar.
25. Himanshu Ranjan S/o Satish Prasad Singh Resident of Village-
Shahbegpur, P.O.- Chintamanichak, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna, Bihar.
26. Happy Gupta S/o Anil Kumar Resident of Village- Bank Road Raxaul,
P.O.- Raxaul, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Chamapran, Bihar.
27. Murari Kumar S/o Baleshwar Singh Residen of Village and P.O.-
Gangasarai, P.S.- Barhiya, District- Lakhisarai.
28. Niranjan Kumar S/o Ram Kewal Singh Resident of Village- Belma, P.O.-
Dharamshala, P.S.- Tikari, District- Gaya, Bihar.
29. Sanjeev Kumar S/o Shambhu Sharan Verma Resident of Village- Abgilla
Devi Sthan, P.O.- Buniyadganj, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.
30. Dharmendra Kumar Bharti S/o Sarjun Chaudhari Resident of Village and
P.O.- Ramraichak, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.
31. Rohit Kumar S/o Raja Ram Saw Resident of Village- Bhusunda, P.O.-
Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.
32. Alok S/o Shambhu Prasad Sharma Resident of Village- Bishambharpur,
P.O.- Datiyana, P.S.- , District-
33. Avinash Kumar Singh S/o Ravi Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Village-
Khiryama, P.S. and P.O.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya.
34. Prashant Kumar S/o Subodh Sah Resident of Village and P.O.- Kharia, P.S.-
Bariyarpur, District- Munger, Bihar.
35. Bharat Kumar S/o Maheshwari Prasad Resident of Village- Kensarai, P.O.-
Kensarai, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada.
36. Avinash Kumar S/o Ramswaroop Prasad Resident of Village- Amarsingh
Bigha, P.O.- Panda Bigha, P.S.- Men, District- Gaya, Bihar.
37. Mithun Kumar S/o Umesh Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Sahebgang
Chouki, P.O.- Champanagar, P.S.- University, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
38. Om Prakash Sahu S/o Jagdish Prasad Sahu Resident of Village- Udhana,
P.O. and P.S.- Laukaha, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
39. Chandan Kumar S/o Suresh Singh Resident of Village- Kumbhi, P.O.-
Samay, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada, Bihar.
40. Suman Kumar S/o Ram Pravesh Gupta Resident of Village- Lohiyanagar
Ward No.28, P.O., P.S.- , District- Begusarai, Bihar.
41. Santu Kumar S/o Satyendra Yadav Resident of Village- Narawat, P.O.-
Piyar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya, Bihar.
42. Alok Kumar Himanshu S/o Dhenukhi Raut Resident of Village and P.O.-
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
3/43
Rampurwa Bazar, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran, Bihar.
43. Manish Kumar Singh S/o Rambabu Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Parsouni Kapoor, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran, Bihar.
44. Sonu Kumar S/o Shiv Shankar Singh Resident of Village- Kapua, P.O. and
P.S.- Rajpur, District- , Bihar.
45. Raju Kumar S/o Manrajeet Chaudhary Resident of Village- Jagmalwa, P.O.
and P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
46. Deepak Kumar S/o Prabhu Kumar Resident of Village- Mahuawa, P.O. and
P.S.- Chiraiya, District- .
47. Amit Kumar S/o Ramotar Prasad Resident of Village- Bijopur, P.O.-
Jarubanbariya, P.S.- Mahkar, District- Gaya, Bihar.
48. Sachin Kumar Tanti S/o Dhaniklal Tanti Resident of Village- Tetariya, P.O.-
Dariyapur, P.S.- Haveli Kharagpur, District- Munger, Bihar.
49. Amit Kumar S/o Raj Kumar Yadav Resident of Village- Shastri Nagar,
Road No.8, P.O.- Munger, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.
50. Vinod Kumar S/o Hira Prasad Resident of Village- Station Road
Marhawarah, P.O.- Marhawarah, P.S.- Marhawarah, District- Saran, Bihar.
51. Ajeet Kumar S/o Surendra Yadav Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.O.-
Ganpura, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
52. Arvind Kumar S/o Ganesh Singh Resident of Village- Akbarpur, P.O.-
Sathiauta, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali, Bihar.
53. Rakesh Kumar S/o Lakhu Singh Resident of Village- Murarpur, P.O.-
Kakariya, P.S.- Itarhi, District- Buxar, Bihar.
54. Kundan Kumar S/o Mahesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Mahathi
Dharmchand, P.O.- Mahathi Dharmchand, P.S.- Tisiauta, District- Vaishali,
Bihar.
55. Rahul Kumar Paswan S/o Rajesh Paswan Resident of Village- Ekray, P.O.-
Ekadha, P.S.- Ari Ari, District- Sheikhpura, Bihar.
56. Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary S/o Arjun Chaudhary Resident of Village and
P.O.- Durgapur, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
57. Raju Kumar S/o Shivshankar Sahani Resident of Village- Roshanpursapha,
P.O.- Sapha, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran, Bihar.
58. Saroj Kumar S/o Vindalal Bhagat Resident of Village- Daudnagar, P.O.-
Chakgado, P.S.- Bidupur, District , Bihar.
59. Preetam Kumar S/o Madan Gopal Singh Resident of Village and Post-
Bimawa, P.S.- Bimawan, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
60. Amit Kumar S/o Radha Govind Thakur Resident of Village- Chandwa,
P.O.- Chandwa, P.S.- Nawada, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
61. Vivek Singh S/o Birendar Singh Resident of Village- Maulabagh, P.O.-
Nawada, P.S.- Nawada, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
62. Virendra Kumar S/o Kailash Singh Resident of Village- Gopalkera, P.O.-
Gopalkera, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya, Bihar.
63. Rahul Roy S/o Raj Kumar Resident of Village- Balulyatar, P.O.- Puraini,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
4/43
P.S.- Mufassil, District- Nawada, Bihar.
64. Rahul Kumar S/o Brahmdeo Prasad Resident of Village- Benipur, P.O.-
Abhaipur, P.S.- Piribazar, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
65. Amit Kumar S/o Satyendra Singh Resident of Village- Shivpur Ara, P.O.-
Ara, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
66. Kislay Kumar S/o Ramashish Yadav Resident of Village- Meghaul, P.O.-
Meghaul, P.S.- Khodawandpur, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
67. Shyam Kumar Yadav S/o Maheshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Yogia,
P.O.- Kamlabari, P.S.- Ladania, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
68. Arbind Singh S/o Lotan Singh Resident of Village- Mahamman Patti, P.O.-
Tujarpur, P.S.- Khairah, District- Saran, Bihar.
69. Bipin Bihari Patel S/o Virchand Patel Resident of Village and P.O.-
Bishunpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Nawada, Bihar.
70. Banty Kumar S/o Subodh Kumar Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Konag, P.S.- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
71. Mahesh Kumar S/o Bhopal Sharma Resident of Village- Dehuni, P.O.-
Golakpur, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad, Bihar.
72. Gaurav Kumar S/o Sanjeev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Bharadwaj
Nagar, P.O.- Bari Aighu, P.S.- Muhffasil, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
73. Saurabh Pal S/o Kameshwar Pal Resident of Village- Mitraj, P.O.-
Sonenagar, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
74. Mihir Kumar S/o Devi Dayal Gupta Resident of Village- Obra, P.O.- Obra,
P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
75. Pravesh Kumar Yadvendu S/o Keshwar Prasad Yadav Resident of Village-
Wireless, P.O.- Civil Aerodrome, P.S.- Magadh Medical, District- Gaya,
Bihar.
76. Ravish Kumar S/o Vijay Tiwari Resident of Village and P.O.- Kab, P.S.-
Ranitalab, District- Patna, Bihar.
77. Rakesh Kumar S/o Arbind Jha Resident of Village- Baijudih, P.O.- Surihari,
P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka, Bihar.
78. Prince Kumar S/o Paras Yadav Resident of Village- Maheshpur, P.O.- Daili,
P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
79. Mithilesh Kumar S/o Kishundeo Yadav Resident of Village- Laxmipur,
P.O.- Lohchi, P.S.- Haveli Kharagpur, District- Munger, Bihar.
80. Ankur Prakash S/o Dadan Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Chatar, P.O.-
Babhangawan, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
81. Swati Suman D/o Rajeev Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Rudauli, P.O.-
Rudauli, P.S.- Bachwara, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
82. Sijay Kumar S/o Shyam Babu Paswan Resident of Village- Nijampur, P.O.-
Shorampur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna, Bihar.
83. Sujit Kumar S/o Lalan Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Awasthichak,
P.O.- Nadhghat, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna, Bihar.
84. Ashish Kumar S/o Shankar Roy Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O.-
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
5/43
Kushmaut, P.S.- Nimachand Pura, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
85. Bablu Kumar Ray S/o Janardan Prasad Ray Resident of Village- Jhauwan
Tola, P.O.- Gorainpur, P.S.- Awatar Nagar, District- Saran, Bihar.
86. Mukesh Kumar Mandal S/o Ramrup Mandal Resident of Village and P.O.-
Sadhua, P.S.- Rangra Chowk, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
87. Bipin Kumar S/o Varun Kumar Resident of Village- Rampur, P.O.- Ope,
P.S.- Aungari, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
88. Rishikesh Kumar S/o Saroj Kumar Resident of Village- Bharkuriya, P.O.-
Sakla Bazar, P.S.- Kachhwan, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
89. Rajesh Kumar S/o Arvind Prasad Resident of Village- Ashok Nagar Rajgir,
P.O.- Rajgir, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
90. Dharamdas Raj Kumar S/o Braj Bihari Prasad Resident of Village- South
Ram Krishna Nagar, P.O.- New Jangpura, P.S.- R.K. Nagar, District- Patna,
Bihar.
91. Harsh Raj S/o Nathuai Pal Resident of Village- English Chichroun, P.O.
and P.S.- Akbarnagar, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
92. Harendra Kumar S/o Rabindra Singh Resident of Village- Pathra P.O.-
Tilouthu, P.S.- Tilothu, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
93. Prabhat Kumar S/o Ramakant Rai Resident of Village- Samahuta, P.O.-
Pipra, P.S.- Karaglor, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
94. Ashish Kumar Swarnkar S/o Binod Prasad Resident of Village and P.O.-
Bamdah, P.S.- Chandramandi, District- Jamui, Bihar.
95. Jitendra Kumar S/o Shiv Shankar Singh Resident of Village- Mohaddiganj,
P.O. and P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
96. Srikant Paswan S/o Shivnath Paswan Resident of Village- Tilai, P.O.-
Ropahatha, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
97. Abhishek Singh S/o Bhola Singh Resident of Village- Srikrishna Nagar,
P.O. and P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
98. Md Yusuf Jamal Ansari S/o Abdul Salam Resident of Village- Jagdishpur,
P.O.- Deobahuatra and P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran, Bihar.
99. Sobaran Kumar S/o Kamal Bind Resident of Village- Dihariya, P.O.-
Dumari, P.S.- Chenari, District- Sasaram, Bihar.
100. Raushan Kumar S/o Shankar Singh Resident of Village- Bhagwatipur, P.O.-
Neora, P.S.- Shahpor, District- Patna, Bihar.
101. Ravi Kumar Pandey S/o Dhruw Pandey Resident of Village- Bhimpatti,
P.O.- Nainijor Chhotki, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
102. Rahul Kumar S/o Birendra Kumar Resident of Village- Adampur, P.O.-
Khagaul, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna, Bihar.
103. Pankaj Kumar S/o Ramsharan Prasad Resident of Village- Beldariya, P.O.-
Raitar, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
104. Satyendra Kumar S/o Dashrath Chauhan Resident of Village- Beldariya,
P.O.- Raitar, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
105. Chandan Kumar S/o Surendra Lal Ray Resident of Village- Dhuparchark,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
6/43
P.O.- Alampur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna, Bihar.
106. Mamta Kumari D/o Rambharosi Mandal Resident of Village- Jagdishpur,
P.O. and P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
107. Saurav Kumar S/o Nawen Kumar Resident of Village- Jakarpura, P.O. and
P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
108. Kundan Kumar S/o Shyamdev Paswan Resident of Village- Bhushaula
Danapur, P.O.- Mubarakpur, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna, Bihar.
109. Upendra Kumar S/o Chandrika Chaudhri Resident of Village- Gaur Bigha,
P.O.- Malikpur, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
110. Shashikant Kumar S/o Shrichand Choudhary Resident of Village and P.O.-
Badichhariyari, P.S.- Tharthari, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
111. Sonu Kumar S/o Subhash Yadav Resident of Village- Chaughara, P.O.-
Hardi, P.S. and District- Supaul, Bihar.
112. Rakesh Kumar S/o Subhash Kumar YAdav Resident of Village- Khagaur
Hakimganj, P.O.- Kiul R.S., P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
113. Ruchi Kumari D/o Deochandra Bhagat Resident of Village and P.O. and
P.S.- Saharghat, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
114. Sanoj Kumar S/o Subhash Choudhary Resident of Village- Ahiapor, P.O.
and P.S.- Maner, District- Patna, Bihar.
115. Sameer Hussain S/o Mahammad Hussain Resident of Village- Banpura,
P.O.- Banpura, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Saran, Bihar.
116. Nikhil Kumar Tiwari S/o Shriniwash Tiwari Resident of Village and P.O.-
Mahammadpur, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran, Bihar.
117. Manish Kumar S/o Rajendra Ram Resident of Village- Naya Tola
Chandanbag, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, P.O. and District- Munger, Bihar.
118. Sanjeev Kumar S/o Yugeshwar Rajak Resident of Village- Maksuspur,
P.O.- Dhobi Tola Munger, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger, Bihar.
119. Abhay Kumar S/o Satydeo Narayan Sinha Resident of Village-
Jayprakashpur, P.O. and P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
120. Vikas Kumar S/o Sakaldeo Yadav Resident of Village- Mahanandpur, P.O.-
Ugawan, P.S.- Asthawan, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
121. Manish Kumar S/o Ramshlok Prasad Resident of Village- Bijopur, P.O.-
Jarubanbariya, P.S.- Mahkar, District- Gaya, Bihar.
122. Ramesh Prasad S/o Lahwar Prasad Resident of Village- Semaria Jahaj
Ghat, P.O. and P.S.- Revalganj, District- Saran, Bihar.
123. DeepShikha D/o Rajendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Maranchi, P.S.- Maranchi, District- Patna, Bihar.
124. Raushan Kumar S/o Siyaram Singh Resident of Village- Kajur, P.O.- Kajur,
P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya, Bihar.
125. Aakash Singh Verma S/o Rakesh Kumar Resident of Village- Khair, P.O.-
Khair, P.S.- Khair, District- Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.
126. Mani Kant Singh S/o Ramesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Gotpa,
P.O.- Gopta, P.S.- Bikramgang, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
7/43
127. Manoj Kumar S/o Upendra Mandal Resident of Village- Dharampur Banni,
P.O.- Banni, P.S.- Maheshkhunt, District- Khagaria, Bihar.
128. Suraj Kumar Sharma S/o Umesh Sharma Resident of Village- Chorauli,
P.O.- Chorauli, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan, Bihar.
129. Sweta Kumari D/o Dinesh Mishra Resident of Village- Ramdas, P.O. and
P.S.- Baghi, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
130. Shubham Raj S/o Dileep Prasad Resident of Village- Fatehpur, P.O. and
P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya, Bihar.
131. Randhir Ranjan S/o Ram Suresh Paswan Resident of Village- Lejur, P.O.-
Lejur, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran, Bihar.
132. Kumari Shalu D/o Pramod Kumar Sharma Resident of Village- Kolhurawa
Mishra Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran, Bihar.
133. Twinkle Kumari D/o Uday Prakash Resident of Village- Jehanabad, P.O.
and P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad, Bihar.
134. Ravi Ranjan Pandey S/o Om Prakash Pandey Resident of Village-
Dharahara, P.O.- Bihiya Chaurasta, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
135. Arjun Kumar S/o Kamlesh Prasad Chaurasiya Resident of Village-
Bhawanipur Mauje, P.O.- Bhawanipur Bazar, P.S.- Nakardei, District- East
Champaran, Bihar.
136. Nand Kishore Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar Yadav Resident of Village-
Nawadih, P.O.- Bajaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya, Bihar.
137. Kumari Rashmi Ranjita D/o Shiv Shankar Sharma Resident of Village-
Manjhar, P.O.- Sapahi, P.S.- Turkaul, District- East Champaran, Bihar.
138. Sikendar Alam S/o Aenul Ali Resident of Village- Salarpur, P.O.- Salarpur,
P.S.- Parbatta, District- Khagaria, Bihar.
139. Ram Prakash Yadav S/o Gopal Yadav Resident of Village- Bara, P.O.-
Khajuria, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
140. Vishwajeet Kumar S/o Sudhanshu Maharaj Resident of Village- Khawaspur
Kala, P.O. and P.S.- Doriganj, District- Saran, Bihar.
141. Raju Kumar S/o Ramdhani Prasad Resident of Village- Yashpur, P.O.-
Tarwan, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya, Bihar.
142. Vinay Bhushan Vidyarthi S/o Suryabhushan Prasad Resident of Village-
Nagwan, P.O.- Durgapur, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
143. Ganit Paswan S/o Suro Paswan Resident of Village- Jairampur, P.O.-
Dharampur Ratti, P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
144. Manish Kumar S/o Deo Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Kulharia, P.O.-
Kulharia, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
145. Manish Kumar S/o Naresh Sah Resident of Village- Suja, P.O.- Suja, P.S.-
Muffasil, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
146. Niraj Kumar S/o Girijanandan Prasad Resident of Village- North Lakhibag
Manpur Gaya, P.O.- Buniyadganj, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.
147. Gunjesh Kumar S/o Pramod Kumar Mishra Resident of Village- Chainpura,
P.O. and P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
8/43
148. Sangita Kumari D/o Atal Bihari Singh Resident of Village- Dumariya, P.O.-
Bharauli, P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
149. Nitish Kumar S/o Surendra Paswan Resident of Village- Niyamatpur, P.O.
and P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
150. Manish Raj S/o Akhilesh Mandal Resident of Village- Sumeshwar Sthan,
P.O. and P.S.- Buxar, District- Buxar, Bihar.
151. Rahul Kumar S/o Ramashankar Singh Resident of Village- Barka Gaon,
P.O.- Barka Gaon, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar, Bihar.
152. Bittu Kumar S/o Lalan Yadav Resident of Village- Mulabagh, P.O. and P.S.-
Ara, District- Bhojpur, Bihar.
153. Monika Kumari D/o Vinay Kumar Resident of Village- Nawada, P.O. and
P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada, Bihar.
154. Parmesh Kumar S/o Rajesh Singh Resident of Village- Amra, P.O.- Saraiya
Aurangabad, P.S.- Amjhor, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
155. Abhyanand Kumar S/o Vishwnath Prasad Resident of Village- Gadiyani
Suryapur, P.O.- Suryapur, P.S.- Shrinagar, District- West Champaran, Bihar.
156. Vivek Kumar S/o Rajendra Singh Resident of Village- Samjhauli, P.O. and
P.S.- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
157. Abhishek Kumar S/o Purushottam Pandey Resident of Village- Woob, P.O.-
Bharoob, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
158. Suryakant Kumar Pandey S/o Purushottam Pandey Resident of Village-
Hero, P.O.- Nagma, P.S.- Meskaur, District- Nawada, Bihar.
159. Manish Kumar Pandey S/o Pramod Kumar Pandey Resident of Village-
Khudaganj, P.O.- Khudaganj, P.S.- Khudaganj, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
160. Rajdev Kumar S/o Rajnandan Choudhary Resident of Village- Kharauna,
P.O.- Ramboxjatipur, P.S.- Nabatpur, District- Patna, Bihar.
161. Usha Kumari D/o Mayanand Mishra Resident of Village- Andhara, P.O.-
Andhara, P.S.- Andhara, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
162. Priyanka Kumari D/o Bisheshwar Nath Rai Resident of Village-
Mishrawliya, P.O.- Kamarpur, P.S.- Muffsil, District- Buxar, Bihar.
163. Amit Anand S/o Subodh Kumar Nirala Resident of Village and P.O.- Latra,
P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
164. Aftab Alam S/o Mohammad Allauddin Resident of Village- Harinagar,
P.O.- Raghunidehat, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
165. Nitish Kumar S/o Satendra Yadav Resident of Village and P.O.- Bahrawan,
P.S.- Barh, District- Patna, Bihar.
166. Priya Ranjan Kumar Sharma S/o Asharfi Sharma Resident of Village and
P.O.- Keshonarayanpur, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur, Bihar.
167. Navneet Kumar Singh S/o Rajkishor Singh Resident of Village- Reganiya,
P.O.- Jhari, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya, Bihar.
168. Manish Kumar S/o Mukesh Kumar Resident of Village- Naya Bazar
Akroura, P.O., P.S. and District- Buxar, Bihar.
169. Vikas Kumar S/o Ramjanm Yadav Resident of Village- Gosain Gown, P.O.-
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
9/43
Dhanakdobh, P.S.- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Bihar.
170. Sandeep Kumar S/o Rajendra Kumar Resident of Village- Dariyasaray,
P.O.- Raitar, P.S.- Silao, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
171. Shailesh Kumar S/o Umesh Prasad Resident of Village- Gopalpur Math,
P.O.- Nadaul, P.S.- Masarhi, District- Patna, Bihar.
172. Nishant Kumar Sah S/o Raj Kumar Sah Resident of Village- Khanua, P.O.-
Keshonarayanpur, P.S.- Patori, District- Samastipur, Bihar.
173. Nirbhay Tiwari S/o Binod Tiwari Resident of Village- Baraon, P.O.-
Baraon, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.
174. Shrikant Kumar S/o Jagranath Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Baraon,
P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
175. Sakambhari Divya D/o Kundendu Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Enai, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran, Bihar.
176. Roji Kumari D/o Mukti Narayan Tiwari Resident of Village- Kuri, P.O.-
Meyari Bazar, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
177. Gaurav Kumar Singh S/o Krishna Kumar Singh Resident of Village and
P.O.- Shyampur, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
178. Nitesh Kumar S/o Pawan Jha Resident of Village- Nondarhi, P.O.-
Sidhapkala, P.S.- Ladania, District- Madhubani, Bihar.
179. Sudhir Kumar S/o Ram Pravesh Pawan Resident of Village- Balimath,
P.O.- Adai, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya, Bihar.
180. Raushan Kumar S/o Akhilesh Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.- Ilara,
P.S.- Cherki, District- Gaya, Bihar.
181. Rahul Kumar S/o Ashok Paswan Resident of Village- Dumari, P.O.-
Kurmawan, P.S.- Cherki, District- Gaya, Bihar.
182. Deepak Kumar S/o Shyamlal Paswan Resident of Village- Asdhiya, P.O.-
Birnoi, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya, Bihar.
183. Suraj Kumar S/o Laddu Ram Resident of Village- Sahebganj Chowki, P.O.-
Champanagar, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
184. Akriti Kumari D/o Nageshwar Paswan Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai, Bihar.
185. Rohit Kumar S/o Shambhu Kumar Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
186. Rashid Akhtar S/o Nayeem Akhtar Resident of Village- Mushkipur,
Bhuriatari, P.O.- Jamalpur, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria, Bihar.
187. Santosh Kumar S/o Naresh Das Resident of Village- Khabba-ka Akhara
Hazari Mohalla, P.O.- Patna City, P.S.- Mehndiganj, District- Patna, Bihar.
188. Maneet Kumar S/o Narayan Yadav Resident of Village- Saino, P.O.- Saino,
P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
189. Ranjay Kumar Pathak S/o Rameshwar Pathak Resident of Village- Barwan,
P.O.- Asaon, P.S.- Andar, District- Siwan, Bihar.
190. Ravi Ranjan Kumar S/o Raju Prasad Resident of Village- Dhunia Mohalla
Rafiganj, P.O. and P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
10/43
191. Prashant Kumar S/o Gopal Sharan Singh Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar.
192. Niranjan Kumar S/o Dinesh Mahto Resident of Village- Shankarpur
Bindtola, P.O.- Shankarpur Chauvnia, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur,
Bihar.
193. Ranjan Kumar Das S/o Kunkun Das Resident of Village- Kharwa, P.O.-
Khiribandh, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
194. Rajesh Kumar S/o Kamdev Das Resident of Village- Purainisarai Rampur,
P.O.- Nathnagar, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.
195. Narayani Shivam D/o Krishn Nandan Sharma Resident of Village- Aunta,
P.O.- Aunta, P.S.- Hathidah, District- Patna, Bihar.
196. Saurav Kumar S/o Late Manoj Kumar Resident of Village- Hasanganj,
P.O.- Safiyabad, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger, Bihar.
197. Nitish Kumar S/o Pranav Kumar Resident of Village- Hasanganj, P.O.-
Safiyabad, P.S.- Kasimbazar, District- Munger, Bihar.
198. Mukul Kumar S/o Baidyanath Yadav Resident of Village- Bagraha, P.O.-
Ahilwar, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur, Bihar.
199. Achchhelal Kumar S/o Singasan Kushawaha Resident of Village- Gokhula,
P.O.- Gokhula, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar.
200. Prabhakar Kumar Singh S/o Ashok Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Saya,
P.O.- Jaipur, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
201. Ravi Ranjan Kumar, S/o Shyam Sunder Singh, Resident of Village and
P.O.-Shahi Minapur, P.S. Aurai, District-Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
202. Niraj Kumar, S/o Gopal Rajak, Resident of Village-Rupauhua, P.O.-
Rajadih, P.S.-Tettiabamber, District-Munger, Bihar.
203. Subhas Kumar, S/o Sikendra Sah, Resident of Village and P.O.-Ghoghsam,
P.S.-Simribakhtiyarpur, District-Saharsa, Bihar.
204. Saurabh Kumar Singh, S/o Hansnath Singh, Resident of Village-Belsand,
P.O.-Belsand, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj, Bihar.
205. Santosh Kumar, S/o Kailash Roy, Resident of Village and P.O.-Bochaha,
P.S.-Mohiuddin Nagar, District-Samastipur, Bihar.
206. Kundan Singh, S/o Ram Balak Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Marachhi, P.S.-Jamo Bazar, District-Siwan, Bihar.
207. Mohit Kumar Singh, S/o Jainendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-
Chhota Badheyan, P.O.-Barauli, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj, Bihar.
208. Diwakar Kumar Upadhyay, S/o Ramchandra Upadhyay, Resident of
Village and P.O. and P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj, Bihar.
209. Nanhe Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shankar Tiwari, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Parauli, P.S.-Basantpur, District-Siwan, Bihar.
210. Sudhir Kumar, S/o Basant Ram, Resident of Village-Bikkam, P.O.-
Kachhiyana, P.S.-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai, Bihar.
211. Dhirendra Kumar, S/o Ramsurat Ram, Resident of Village and P.O.-Korara,
P.S.-Paliganj, District-Patna, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
11/43
212. Om Prakash Yadav, S/o Mahanth Yadav, Resident of Village-Surwaniya,
P.O.-Nautan, P.S. Mirganj, District-Gopalganj, Bihar.
213. Asmita Sinha, D/o Alok Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.-Chhatas, P.S.-
Masaurhi, District-Patna, Bihar.
214. Endrendra Kumar, S/o Rameshwar Ram, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Korara, P.S. Paliganj, District-Patna, Bihar.
215. Nidhi Kumari, D/o Shankar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-
Dhamar, Bhojpur, District-Patna, Bihar.
216. Neha Kumari, D/o Chandra Shekhar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Siaruan, P.S. Jagdishpur, District-Bhojpur, Bihar.
217. Archana Kumari, D/o Baikunth Sharma, Resident of Village and P.O. and
P.S.-Ayer, District-Bhojpur, Bihar.
218. Avinash Kumar, S/o Vinod Kumar Sharma, Resident of Village and P.O.
and P.S.-Agiaon, District-Bhojpur, Bihar.
219. Raju Kumar Sharma, S/o Sukul Sharma, Resident of Village-Dulhinganj,
P.O. Saneya Brahata, P.S. Jagdishpur, District-Bhojpur, Bihar.
220. Ashutosh Kumar, S/o Shivnandan Prasad Sah, Resident of Village-Rajganj,
P.O. Haveli Kharagpur, P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger, Bihar.
221. Pappu Kumar, S./o Shiv Narayan Pandit, Resident of Village-Tengra, P.O.
Tengra, P.S. -Belhar, District Banka, Bihar.
222. Ranjit Kumar, S/o Harinandan Pandit, Resident of Village Navtolia, P.O.-
Saria, P.S. Chautham, District-Khagaria, Bihar.
223. Shashi Kant Prasad, S/o Lal Bahadur Prasad, Resident of Village-
Vishwanath Patti, P.O. Bharwara, P.S.-Singhwara, District Darbhanga,
Bihar.
224. Radheshyam Paswan, S/o Badhan Paswan, Resident of Village-
Darogibigha, P.O.-Chauranwan, P.S. Sheikhpur Sarai, District-Sheikhpura,
Bihar.
225. Prashant Kumar, S/o Arvind Persad, Resident of Village-Akbarpur Bich
Bazar, P.O. Rajhat, P.S.-Akbarpur, District-Nawada, Bihar.
226. Aditya Kumar, S/o Satyanarayan Yadav, Resident of Village-Rasalpur, P.O.-
Rasalpur, P.S.-Salkhua, District-Saharsa, Bihar.
227. Vicky Kumar, S/o Kishori Prasad, Resident of Village-Akbarpur, P.O.
Rajhat, P.S. Akbarpur, District-Nawada, Bihar.
228. Jitendra Kumar Beldar, S/o Shankar Beldar, Resident of Village-Lakhanpur,
P.O. Budhgere, P.S. Muffasil, District-Gaya, Bihar.
229. Pawan Kumar Yadav, S/o Mangal Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-
Pathardei, P.O. Jiradei, P.S. Jiradei, District-Siwan, Bihar.
230. Umar Ansari, S/o Md. Khurshid Ansari, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Kakwara, P.S. Banka, District-Banka, Bihar.
231. Suman Kumar, S/o Jayprakash Yadav, Resident of Village-Shrinagar, P.S.
Sahebpur Kamal, P.O.-Chharrapatti, District-Begusarai, Bihar.
232. Vikash Kumar, S/o Birbali Prasad, Resident of Village-Naurana, P.O. and
P.S.-Islampur, District-Nalanda, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
12/43
233. Krishna Kumar Paswan, S/o Govind Paswan, Resident of Village-Mujra,
P.O. and P.S.-Ramnagar, District-West Champaran, Bihar.
234. Shubham Kumar, S/o Ashok Kumar, Resident of Village-Akbarpur, P.O.
Rajhat, P.S. Akbarpur, District-Nawada, Bihar.
235. Nitish Kumar, S/o Pramod Jha, Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-
Supaul, District-Supaul, Bihar.
236. Priyanka Khare, D/o Mukesh Khare, Resident of Village-Chhindwara
Colony, P.O. and P.S.-Chindwara, District-Chindwara, Madhya Pradesh.
237. Himanshu Kumar, S/o Barmeshwar Prasad Mandal, Resident of Village-
Vishal, P.O.-Barmasia, P.S.-Pirpainti, District-Bhagalpur, Bihar.
238. Pooja Kumari, Daughter of Balram Thakur, Resident of Village-Kuanhi,
P.O.-Chaurghatta, P.S.-Baruraj, District-Muzaffarpur.
239. Abhash Parasar, Son of Jyotish Chandra Jha, Resident of Village Rani bari,
P.S.-Knagar, P.O.-Khokha, District-Purnia.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission through its Secretary,
Santosh Manson, B-block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
5. The Chairman, Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission through its
Secretary, Santosh Manson, B-block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
6. The Secretary, Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission, Santosh
Manson, B-block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
7. The Officer on Special Duty, Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service
Commission, Santosh Manson, B-block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
8. Manish Kumar Thakur, Son of Shesnath Thakur, Resident of Village-
Somgadh, P.O. and P.S.-Sathi, District-West Champaran.
9. Nitesh Kumar, son of Shiv Chandra Sah, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Banghra, P.S.-Ghatho, District-Samastipur.
10. Sanjeet Kumar, son of Munarik Bind, Resident of Village and P.S.-
Maheshpur Dih, P.O.-Yogipur, District-Nalanda.
11. Bambam Kumar, son of Sanjay Roy, Resident of Village -Sihma Tola, P.S.-
Muffasil, P.O.-Dhabauli, District-Begusarai.
12. Aman Kumar Sudhanshu, Son of Binod Kumar Sudhanshu, Resident of
Village and P.O.-Madhurapur (Sourth Tola Nagar), P.S.-Teghra, District-
Begusarai.
13. Raju Kumar, Son of Sunil Kumar Roy, Resident of Village-Ghoda, P.O. and
P.S.-Teghra, District-Begusarai.
14. Khusboo Kumari, Daughter of Murari Sah, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Singhaul, P.S.-Singhaul, District-Begusarai.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
13/43
15. Rohit Kumar, Son of Suresh Mahto, Resident of Village-Sahilori, P.O.-
Sanjat, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, District-Begusarai.
16. Kundan Kumar, Son of Pawan Kumar pabnandu, Resident of Village-
Begampur, P.O.-Chhatauna, P.S. Naokothi, District-Begusarai.
17. Sweety Kumari, Daughter of Sashibhushan Singh, Resident of Village and
P.O. Ullao, P.S.-Mufasil, District-Begusarai.
18. Krishna Kanhaiya, Son of Ashok Kumar, Resident of Village and P.O.-
Chhatauna, P.S. Naokothi, District-Begusarai.
19. Deepa Kumari, Daughter of Rajkishor Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-
Vrindavan, P.O.-Dafarpur, P.S. Naokothi, District-Begusarai.
20. Mala Kumari, son of Sambhu Jha, Resident of Village-Samho Sarlahi, P.O.-
S.S. Barari, P.S.-Shamho, District-Begusarai.
21. Kaju Kumar, Son of Ranjan Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.-Katarmala,
P.S. Dandari, District-Begusarai.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4769 of 2022
======================================================
1. Ravish Kumar Son of Shailendra Singh Resident of Village- Kotawan, PO
and PS- Barauli, District- Gopalganj (Bihar).
2. Ritesh Kumar Son of Krishna Mahato Resident of Village- Chhota
Shekhpura, P.O.- Chhota Shekhpura, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada (Bihar).
3. Arbind Kumar Son of Suresh Singh Resident of Village- Chhatihar, P.O.-
Chhatihar, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada (Bihar).
4. Sanjay Kumar Son of Saheb Sahni Resident of Darbhanga (Abhanda), P.O.
and P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga (Bihar).
5. Santosh Kumar Son of Jokhu Baitha Resident of Village and P.O.-
Bankatwa, P.S.- Jitna, District- East Champaran (Bihar).
6. Abhishek Kumar Son of Awadhesh Prasad Resident of Village- Devi Sarai,
P.O.- Maghra, P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
7. Rakesh Kumar Son of Pramod Kumar Singh Resident of Kiul Basti, Pachna
Road, Near BSNL Tower, P.O. and P.S. and District- Lakhisarai (Bihar).
8. Vikas Kumar Utsav Son of Ramkripal Prasad Resident of Motihari, P.S.-
Banjaria, District- East Champaran (Bihar).
9. Rajan Kumar Son of Ram Bilas Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Saraiya,
P.O.- Barbigha, P.S.- Jairampur, District- Shekhpura (Bihar).
10. Pawan Kumar Son of Mahesh Singh Resident of Village- Rojapar, P.O., P.S.
and District- Arwal (Bihar).
11. Bittu Kumar Son of Krishna Prasad Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Haspura, District- Aurangabad.
12. Ratan Kumar Son of Ramashray Chaudhary Resident of Village, P.O. and
P.S. Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi (Bihar).
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
14/43
13. Vipul Kumar Son of Sanjay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Raniganj
Mohalla, P.O. and P.S.- Nara Chakia, District- East Champaran (Bihar).
14. Santosh Kumar Ram Son of Umesh Ram Resident of Village- Bhagirathpur,
P.O.- Jitwaria, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur (Bihar).
15. Raj Kishor Shah Son of Hari Lal Sah Resident of Village- Mahisari, P.O.-
Bhawanipur, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga (Bihar).
16. Nitish Kumar Son of Nawal Kishore Singh Resident of Village- Pendapur,
P.O.- Kawa, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
17. Narendra Pandey Son of Sunil Pandey Resident of Village and P.O.-
Kaithwan, P.S. and District- Sheikhpura (Bihar).
18. Santosh Kumar Son of Anant Ram Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur at Ara (Bihar).
19. Mahavir Kumar Son of Ganauri Yadav Resident of Village- Ganeshchak,
P.O.- Bhadeya, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya (Bihar).
20. Abinash Kumar Son of Prakash Mani Kumar Satyanshi Resident of
Lakhanchand Madhotola, P.O.- Mokama Ghat, P.S.- Mokama, District-
Patna (Bihar).
21. Kundan Kumar Son of Ramchandra Mahto Resident of Village and P.O.-
Shivnar, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna (Bihar).
22. Ankit Kumar Son of Virendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Mor
English, P.O.- Mor, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna (Bihar).
23. Ankit Kumar Paswan Son of Dinesh Paswan Resident of Village- Narma,
P.O.- Raily, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya (Bihar).
24. Sauraw Kumar Son of Vindeshwari Mandal Resident of Village- Bariarpur
Basti, P.O. and P.S.- Bariarpur, District- Munger (Bihar).
25. Ramesh Kumar Son of Ramchandra Sah Resident of Village- Lakhnauri,
P.O. and P.S.- Muhabbatpur, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar).
26. Chandan Kumar Ram Son of Meghnath Ram Resident of Village- Bheriya,
P.O.- Ranisagar, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur (Bihar).
27. Rakesh Kumar Son of Subhash Prasad Yadav Resident of Village and P.O.-
Shri Nagar, P.S.- Ghailarh, District- Madhepura (Bihar).
28. Raviranjan Kumar Son of Satish Raghav Resident of English, Ward No.2,
P.O., P.S. and District- Lakhisarai (Bihar).
29. Alok Kumar Son of Loknath Prasad Chourasiya Resident of Village- Kon,
P.O. and P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
30. Suresh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Malik Chand Chaudhary Resident of
Village- Amjhar Sharif, P.O. and P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad
(Bihar).
31. Raman Kumar Son of Ramdayal Keshri Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Bakhri, District- Begusarai (Bihar).
32. Bijendra Chaudhary Son of Ram Balee Chaudhary Resident of Village-
Masuda, P.O.- Sakri Khurd, P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal (Bihar).
33. Awnish Kumar Son of Sudhir Sharma Resident of Village- Shambhupura,
P.O.- Tiskhora, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna (Bihar).
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
15/43
34. Ashish Kumar Sharma Son of Ram Sringar Sharma Resident of Village-
Nawtan, P.O. and P.S.- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj (Bihar).
35. Sintu Ram Son of Bikau Ram Resident of Village- Mishrauli, P.O.- Belahi
Khas, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj (Bihar).
36. Shankar Kumar Son of Kamlesh Kumar Resident of Village- Porai, P.O. and
P.S.- Harnaut District- Nalanda (Bihar).
37. Manish Kumar Singh Son of Santosh Kumar Singh Resident of Village and
P.O.- Gamharia, P.S.- Akorhi Gola, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
38. Sonu Kumar Son of Ram Talika Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.-
Gamharia, P.S.- Akorhi Gola, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
39. Vikash Kumar Singh Son of Triveni Singh Resident of Village- Anantpur,
P.O.- Rooppur, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bihar).
40. Sagar Kumar Son of Chandra Dev Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Rampur Waina, P.S.- Parasi, District- Arwal (Bihar).
41. Sudhakar Kumar Son of Vijay Prasad Resident of Village- Kushwaha Nagar,
P.O., P.S. and District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
42. Karanveer Son of Upendra Chaudhary Resident of Didarganj Dharamshala,
P.O.- Patna City, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
43. Mithilesh Kumar Son of Ramjee Prasad Resident of Village- Piprahiyan,
P.O.- Usuri Kala, P.S.- Isuapur, District- Saran (Bihar).
44. Jay Prakash Narayan Son of Suresh Prasad Resident of Village- Dharampur,
P.O.- Kurmavan, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya (Bihar).
45. Sunny Kumar Singh Son of Sanjeevan Kumar Singh Resident of Village,
P.O. and P.S.- Malaypur, District- Jamui (Bihar).
46. Ratnesh Kumar Son of Nagendra Paswan Resident of Village- Mudila, P.O.-
Bariarwa, P.S.- Chautarwa, District- West Champaran (Bihar).
47. Jay Krishna Kumar Son of Umesh Prasad Yadav Resident of Village-
Phutkipur, P.O.- Sanjha, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka (Bihar).
48. Sujit Kumar Singh Son of Krishna Deo Singh Resident of Village, P.O. and
P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad (Bihar).
49. Dileep Chaudhari son of Basudev Chaudhary Resident of Village- Paharpur,
P.O.- Kenar Chatty, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya (Bihar).
50. Rakesh Kumar Suman Son of Gaya Ravidas Resident of Village- Barsouna,
P.O.- Sohaipur, P.S.- Tankuppa, District- Gaya (Bihar).
51. Nitish Kumar Son of Nageshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Gobindpur,
P.O.- Salegpur, P.S.- Falka, District- Katihar (Bihar).
52. Jainendra Kumar Son of Yadu Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.- Pawa,
P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
53. Randhir Kumar Son of Parmanand Ray Resident of Mohalla- Didarganj
Patna City, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
54. Yuvraj Kumar Sah Son of Ram Talika Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.-
Rajawar, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka (Bihar).
55. Chandan Kumar Son of Dineshwar Singh Resident of Village- Kansopur,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
16/43
P.O.- Baidrabad, P.S. and District- Arwal (Bihar).
56. Raja Mukhia Son of Sugriv Mukhia Resident of Village- Laukaria, P.O.-
Anjua, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran (Bihar).
57. Rajesh Mohan Son of Sudehan Paswan Resident of Village- Tarwan, P.O.-
Pabhera, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna (Bihar).
58. Mahesh Kumar Son of Naresh Prasad Resident of Village- Bandhuchak,
P.O.- Bhadsara, P.S.- Pali, District- Jehanabad (Bihar).
59. Shekhar Kumar Son of Subhash Sharma Resident of Village- Nayagaon
Shiromani Tola, P.O.- Nayagaon, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Khagaria (Bihar).
60. Vimal Kumar Son of Jagdish Prasad Resident of Village- Punitbigha, P.O.-
Pandooi, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad (Bihar).
61. Sonu Kumar Son of Chandradev Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.-
Srirampur, P.O. and P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya (Bihar).
62. Gaurav Kumar Son of Rampravesh Ram Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Anti, District- Gaya (Bihar).
63. Shankar Kumar Ray Son of Moti Lal Ray Resident of Village- Murhaddi,
P.O. and P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani (Bihar).
64. Banti Kumar Son of Parmanand Singh Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.-
Muffasil, District- Munger (Bihar).
65. Harsh Kumar Son of Anil Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Jwas, P.O.-
Dhiradar, P.S.- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai (Bihar).
66. Om Prakash Chaudhari Son of Anil Chaudhari Resident of Village-
Chahunta, P.O.- Khuthan, P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
67. Neeraj Kumar Son of Nagina Paswan Resident of Village- Mustafapur, P.O.-
Palatpura, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
68. Kundan Kumar Son of Ram Yatan Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.-
Kathrahi, P.S.- Bind, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
69. Vikash Kumar Son of Dinesh Ravidas Resident of Village- Salaiya Khurd,
P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya (Bihar).
70. Avitav Bachan Son of Ganga Prasad Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Haripur, P.S.- Alouli, District- Khagaria (Bihar).
71. Raushan Kumar Son of Suresh Vishwakarma Resident of Village and P.O.-
Alipur, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya (Bihar).
72. Shambhu Kumar Son of Upendra Paswan Resident of Village- Pawapuri,
P.O.- Moratalab, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
73. Ranjan Kumar Son of Shyam Sundar Prasad Resident of Village- Rupaspur,
P.O.- Bangpur, P.S.- Tharthari, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
74. Rocky Kumar Son of Bhola Prasad Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-
Biharsharif, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
75. Chandan Kumar Son of Ramjee Chaudhary Resident of Village, P.O. and
P.S.- Baruraj, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar).
76. Rohit Ranjan Son of Satyendra Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Biseni
Khurd, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
17/43
77. Rahul Kumar Son of Shashi Shankar Prasad Resident of Mohalla and P.S.-
Lohiya Nagar, District- Begusarai (Bihar).
78. Munna Kumar Das Son of Chhattar Das Resident of Village- Chinveria,
P.O.- Arbaria, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui (Bihar).
79. Gunnu Kumar Son of Gautam Prasad Singh Resident of Villagee- Muraura,
P.S.- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
80. Md. Amir Alam Son of Md. Sahabuddin Ansari Resident of Village-
Rakasiyan, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
81. Vikash Kumar Son of Prabhansh Kumar Resident of Village- Dulhinganj,
P.O.- Saneya Barhta, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur (Bihar).
82. Sumit Kumar Son of Krishnand Yadav Resident of Village- Krishna Puri
Yadav, P.O.- Madhubani, P.S.- K. Hat, District- Purnea (Bihar).
83. Raushan Kumar Son of Yogendra Prasad Resident of Village- 17 No.
Talabpar, Sohsarai, P.O. and P.S.- Sohsarai, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
84. Lalu Yadav Son of Janardan Yadav Resident of Village- Kumarsar, Laliya,
P.S.- Kumarsar, District- Munger (Bihar).
85. Vikas Kumar Singh Son of Shambhu Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-
Bhagwatiya, P.S.- Kesariya, District- East Champaran (Bihar).
86. Harendra Kumar Manjhi Son of Mahajan Manjhi Resident of Village and
P.O.- Balia, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan (Bihar).
87. Banti Kumar Son of Ganesh Mistry Resident of Village- Ramtola, P.O. and
P.S.- Hathidah, District- Patna (Bihar).
88. Narendra Kumar Rajak Son of Mahendra Ram Resident of Village and P.O.-
Chaturbhuji Baraon, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur (Bihar).
89. Harish Kumar Son of Lal Mohan Chaudhary Resident of Village and P.O.-
Turkbigha, P.S.- Kachhwan, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
90. Jayprakash Kumar Son of Ramiswar Singh Resident of Village- Durgapur,
P.O. and P.S.- Kaler, District- Arwal (Bihar).
91. Dhanoj Tiwari Son of Muktinath Tiwari Resident of Village- Madar Khas,
P.O. and P.S.- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj (Bihar).
92. Rakesh Kumar Bharti Son of Ramshankar Chaudhary Resident of Village-
Bair Bigha, P.O. and P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Bihar Public Sub-ordinate Service Commission through its Secretary,
Santosh Manson, B-Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
5. The Chairman, Bihar Public Sub-ordinate Service Commission through its
Secretary, Santosh Manson, B-Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
18/43
6. The Secretary, Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission, Santosh
Manson, B-Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
7. The Officer on Special Duty, Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service
Commission, Santosh Manson, B-Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna.
8. Manish Kumar Thakur Son of Shesnath Thakur Resident of Village-
Somgadh, P.O. and P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.
9. Nitesh Kumar Son of Shiv Chandra Sah Resident of Village and P.O.-
Banghra, P.S.- Ghatho, District- Samastipur.
10. Sanjeet Kumar Son of Munarik Bind Resident of Village and P.S.-
Maheshpur Dih, P.O.- Yogipur, District- Nalanda.
11. Bambam Kumar Son of Sanjay Roy Resident of Village- Sihma Tola, P.S.-
Muffasil, P.O.- Dhabauli, District- Begusarai.
12. Aman Kumar Sudhanshu Son of Binod Kumar Sudhanshu Resident of
Village and P.O.- Madhurapur (South Tola Nagar), P.S.- Teghra, District-
Begusarai.
13. Raju Kumar Son of Sunil Kumar Roy Resident of Village- Ghoda, P.O. and
P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai.
14. Khusboo Kumari Daughter of Murari Sah Resident of Village and P.O.-
Singhaul, P.S.- Singhaul, District- Begusarai.
15. Rohit Kumar Son of Suresh Mahto Resident of Village- Sahilori, P.O.-
Sanjat, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai.
16. Kundan Kumar Son of Pawan Kumar Pabnandu Resident of Village-
Begampur, P.O.- Chhatauna, P.S.- Naokothi, District- Begusarai.
17. Sweety Kumari Daughter of Sashibhushan Singh Resident of Village and
P.O.- Ullao, P.S.- Mufasil, District- Begusarai.
18. Krishna Kanhaiya Son of Ashok Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.-
Chhatauna, P.S.- Naokothi, District- Begusarai.
19. Deepa Kumari Daughter of Rajkishor Prasad Singh Resident of Village-
Vrindavan, P.O.- Dafarpur, P.S.- Naokothi, District- Begusarai.
20. Mala Kumari Son of Sambhu Jha Resident of Village- Samho Sarlahi, P.O.-
S.S. Barari, P.S.- Shamho, District- Begusarai.
21. Kaju Kuamr Son of Ranjan Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Katarmala,
P.S.- Dandari, District- Begusarai.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3435 of 2022)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC- 8
For the BPSSC : Mr. P. K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate
Mr. Aniket Singh, Advocate
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4769 of 2022)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC- 8
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
19/43
For the BPSSC : Mr. P. K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocates
Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 25-03-2025
The Cluster of the petitioners in both the cases are
represented through Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned Advocate for the
petitioners with M/s Ritika Rani, learned Advocate. The Bihar
Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission is represented through
Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned Senior Advocate. Mr. Sheo Shankar
Prasad, learned SC-8 appears on behalf of the State.
2. The entire selection process as well as
appointment of the selected candidates against Advertisement
No. 1/2019 is put to challenge in the premise of the same being
suffered from the vice of serious irregularities. The petitioners
sought a direction upon the concerned respondents to produce
question booklet, OMR sheet and answer key pertaining to
Preliminary and Mains examination conducted in relation to
Advertisement No. 1/2019. The petitioners are aggrieved with
the merit list of Bihar Police Sub-Inspector published on
17.06.2021
, as contained in Annexure-9 Series against the
advertisement No. 1/2019 for the Post of Police Sub-Inspector,
Sergeant, Assistant Superintendent Jail (Direct Recruitment),
Assistant Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen) conducted by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
20/43
Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission as well as
consequential appointment letters, as contained in Annexures-
12,13 and 14 of the writ petition, as the same are prepared and
issued in complete defiance of the prescription of the
Advertisement as well as the concerned Rules; Moreover, the
cut off mark of 75.8% under the General Category has been
reduced to 75% in a most arbitrary manner after ousting the
meritorious candidates and thereby violated Articles 14 and 16
of the Constitution of India.
3. Besides the aforenoted reliefs, the petitioners
also sought a declaration from this Court to hold that the entire
process of selection and appointment against Advertisement No.
1/ 2019 is in complete disregard of the terms and conditions
incorporated in the Advertisement. Apart from the process of
selection being nontransparent and unreasonable to extend
favour to undeserving persons and thereby misused the office.
The petitioners in substance sought a direction upon the
respondents to disclose the reason for not declaring the
petitioners successful despite scoring more than the cut off
marks in mains written examination and further to declare the
petitioners successful for the post advertised and appoint them
as per their merit position and to extend all consequential
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
21/43
service benefits.
4. To adjudicate the claim of the petitioners,
necessary facts, as culled out from the materials available on
record, are as follows:
(i) To facilitate the selection of the candidates to the
post of Group ‘C’ of the Home (Police) Department and posts of
other Department under the State Government of Bihar, the
Government of Bihar constituted Bihar Police Sub-Ordinate
Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the
Commission’) under the Bihar Police Sub-Ordinate Service
Commission, Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act,
2016’). In terms of the Act, 2016, the Commission is
empowered to select the candidates for appointment to the cadre
post enumerated in the appended schedule according to the
prescribed procedure under the Service Cadre Rules of
respective posts/departments. As per Sub-Clause 2 of Sub-
Section 9 of the Act, 2016, it was specifically provided that the
Commission may hold a Combined Competitive Examination
for the post with similar eligibility criteria. Subsequent to the
formation of the Commission, several advertisements for
selection of the candidates on various posts of Group-C of the
Home (Police) Department have been published by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
22/43
Commission. In similar manner the captioned Advertisement
No. 1/2019 was published on 21.08.2019 by the Commission in
the light of the requisition sent by the State Government.
Altogether 2446 vacancies were advertised for appointment on
the post of Police Sub-Inspector, Sergeant, Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Direct Recruitment), Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen).
(ii) In terms of the Advertisement, out of 2446
posts, 2064 posts were for Police Sub-Inspector, 215 posts were
for Sergeant, 125 posts were for Assistant Superintendent Jail
(Direct Recruitment) and 42 posts were for Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen). The entire selection
process was primarily divided into two written examination i.e.
preliminary examination and thereafter mains examination. In
terms of the Advertisement, in the Preliminary examination, the
Commission was required to select candidates 20 times of the
vacancy/post advertised and in the Mains examination, the
Commission was required to select candidate 6 times of
vacancy/post advertised for participation in the Physical
Evaluation Test (hereinafter referred to as ‘the PET
examination’). The final result of the successful candidates of
the Combined (Mains) Competitive Examination and PET
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
23/43
examination was to be published cadre wise in a consolidated
integrated and reserved category in order of the merit.
(iii) The petitioners having found requisite
qualification, applied against the Advertisement No.1/2019 for
recruitment to the post of Police Sub-Inspector, Sergeant,
Assistant Superintendent Jail (Direct Recruitment), Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen).The petitioners were
issued admit card and they appeared in Combined Preliminary
Examination, which was held on 22.12.2019 and declared
successful. The copy of the result of the Preliminary
Examination dated 28.01.2020 is placed as Annexure-4 Series to
the writ petition. Upon being successful, the petitioners were
further received Admit Card for appearing in Combined Mains
Examination and finally the petitioners along with 15,231
candidates were declared successful, the result of which was
published on 16.01.2021. For recruitment to the post of Police
Sub-Inspector, Sergeant, Assistant Superintendent Jail (Direct
Recruitment), Assistant Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen),
the cut off marks for General Category (Male) was shown as
75.8% and they were declared eligible and asked for PET
Examination scheduled to be held between 22.03.2021 to
12.04.2021. The result of Combined Mains Examination is
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
24/43
placed on record as Annexure-6 Series to the writ petition.
(iv) The petitioners along with other successful
candidates duly participated in the PET on 17.06.2021, final
merit list was published by the Commission on its website
indicating the category wise cut off marks. The name of the
petitioners did not find place in the list of successful candidates
in final merit list published on 17.06.2021, even after attaining
higher marks than the cut off marks fixed as 75.8% published by
the Commission under the General Category (Male). Hence, the
writ petitions.
5. Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned Advocate appearing on
behalf of the petitioners harping upon the alleged infirmities in
the selection process arising out of Advertisement No. 1/2019
has primarily contended that after coming into existence of the
Commission, the Government of Bihar in exercise of power
provided under Proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, read
with Sections 55 and 97 of the Bihar Police Act, 2007 has made
certain amendments by issuance of notification dated
31.08.2017. The copy of the notification dated 31.08.2017 has
been placed on record as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
6. After taking this Court through the relevant
prescriptions of the notification, it has been submitted before
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
25/43
this Court that in terms of Rule 654(d) of the Bihar Police
Manual after conducting Mains Competitive Examination and
PET, service cadre wise combined competitive result was to be
published under consolidated integrated cadre wise and reserved
category wise in order of merit, but the same has not been done.
The Commission has not recommended the names of the
candidates as per the reserved category wise and merit wise in
descending order according to requisition received from the
Director General of Police. The appointment letter issued by the
respondents, as contained in Annexures-12, 13 and 14 is in
complete disregard to the prescriptions provided under Rule
655(d) of the Bihar Police Manual.
7. It is the admitted position that the petitioners
were declared successful in Preliminary as well as Mains
Examination and also performed very well in the PET and have
secured more marks than the cut off marks, as was fixed at
75.8% under the General Category (Male), but to the utter
dismay and surprise, it was arbitrarily reduced to 75% and
without assigning any reason arbitrarily did not include the
name of the petitioners in the final merit list. The petitioners
sought an information from the Public Information Officer, as
also requested to produce OMR Answer sheet, total marks
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
26/43
obtained in the Combined Mains Examination along with the
answer keys, based upon which the Commission evaluated the
score card and to disclose the reason for declaring the
petitioners unsuccessful in the final merit list, but the same has
not been done. The petitioners along with others preferred
C.W.J.C. No.13689 of 2021, however, it came to be dismissed
owing to non-joinder of necessary and proper party at lest in the
representative capacity, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file
fresh petition.
8. It has been apprised to this Court that the
information received under the Right to Information Act, 2005,
indicates that the auction of answer book is in process and no
information will be supplied, which is clearly suggestive of the
fact that the Commission has acted in nontransparent manner in
completing the selection process and issuance of appointment
letters. Learned Advocate would thus submit that every
selection process shall be conducted in a manner free from
doubt and the candidate shall have confidence in the selection
process in the larger interest, however, the petitioners are still
not aware of the reason for not being declared successful.
9. Learned Advocate for the petitioners further
reminded this Court that it is settled principle of law that Right
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
27/43
to Information Act, which is basically founded in the right to
know is intrinsic part of liberty guaranteed under Article 19(1(a)
of the Constitution. To support the aforesaid contention, reliance
has been placed on a Full Bench Decision of the Delhi High
Court in the case of Secretary General, Supreme Court of
India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, reported in AIR 2010
DELHI 159. The decision rendered by the Apex Court in the
case of Central Board of Sec. Education & Anr. vs Aditya
Bandopadhyay & Ors, reported in (2011) 8 SCC 497 has also
been cited to emphasize that the right to information is a
cherished right. Information and right to information are
intended to be formidable tools in the hands of responsible
citizens to fight corruption and to bring in transparency and
accountability. If the answer-keys are kept secret and not
published along with the result of the test. It would not be
correct way of looking at these matters which involve the future
of hundreds of students who are aspirants for admission to
professional courses and thus remedy would have been worse
than the disease because, so many students would have had to
suffer the injustice in silence as observed in the case of Kanpur
University and Others Vs. Samir Gupta and Others, reported
in (1983) 4 SCC 309.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
28/43
10. Much emphasis has been given that the marks
obtained by the petitioners are more than the cut off marks than
many appointed persons, hence, the respondents are duty bound
to recommend the name of the petitioners for appointment
against Advertisement No. 1/2019 on appropriate posts, as per
the merit list. Slashing down the cut off marks from 75.8% to
75% clearly shows that the respondents have tinkered with the
rules of game in so far as the prescription of eligibility criteria
and the procedure for selection are concerned.
11. Heavy reliance has been placed on the
Constitution Bench decision of the Apex Court in the case of
Tej Prakash Pathak and Others Vs. Rajasthan High Court
and Others, reported in (2025) 2 SCC 1 that the “rules of
game” cannot be changed after commencement of the
recruitment process. Reliance has also been placed on a decision
rendered in the case of Bedanga Talukdar vs Saifudaullah
Khan & Ors. Reported in (2011) 12 SCC 85 as well as State
of Bihar & Ors vs Mithilesh Kumar, reported in (2010) 13
SCC 467, to fortify the contention that the terms and conditions
of the Advertisement has to be necesarily acted upon. Arbitrary
fixation of the cut off marks in the final merit list in absence of
any stipulation in the advertisement is bad in law and for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
29/43
said contention, reliance has been placed on a decision in the
case of Amrit Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand, reported in 2025
SCC OnLine SC 280.
12. Dispelling the aforenoted contention, learned
Senior Advocate, Mr. P. K. Shahi, for the Commission, has
contended that the entire selection process has been finalized in
conformity with the terms of the advertisement and the Rules
applicable thereto. As per the advertisement, the Commission
was required to select the candidates 20 times of the
vacancy/post advertised in the Mains examination and the
Commission was required to select the candidate 6 times of
vacancy/post advertised for participation in the PET. So far the
PET is concerned, the eligibility criteria for being successful
in the PET for the post of Police Sub-Inspector, Sergeant,
Assistant Superintendent Jail (Direct Recruitment) was one and
the same, as it was the post for the Police Sub-Inspector and so
far the Assistant Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen) is
concerned, there was no requirement for the candidates to
undergo PET. The candidates for the post of Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen) were only required to pass
preliminary as well as mains examination.
13. Referring to the averments made in the counter
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
30/43
affidavit, it is contended that altogether 6,15,000 candidates
applied for participating in the Combined Competitive
Examination. However, the total 5,85,829 candidates had
participated in the Preliminary Examination, out of which
4,75,416 candidates were selected and allowed for participating
in Mains Examination. In the Combined Mains Examination
conducted by the Commission altogether 15231 candidates were
selected and allowed to participate in the PET for the post of
Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Sergeant and Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Direct recruitment).
14. Referring to the result of Mains Examination
published on 16.01.2021, it is submitted that altogether 453
candidates had passed the Mains Examination for the post of
Assistant Superintendent Jail (Ex-Servicemen). The final result
of which was duly published on 08.03.2021 itself
recommending the names of 40 candidates for being appointed
against 42 posts. The Commission had declared the cut off
marks in all the categories as is apparent from the final merit
list. After conducting necessary PET on the schedule date and
time, the Commission published final result on 17.06.2021
recommending total 2062 candidates for being appointed on the
post of Police Sub-Inspector, 215 candidates for the post of
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
31/43
Sergeant and 125 candidates for the post of Assistant
Superintendent Jail (Direct Recruitment).
15. Mr. Shahi, learned Senior Advocate, further
argued that while declaring the result of the Mains Examination
and final selection result, the Commission had also declared the
cut off marks in all the categories; and the candidates, who had
cleared Mains Examination were required to participate in the
PET, as per their choice of post. The final result itself had given
the data of the candidates, who were selected for PET and their
performance event wise. Bare perusal of the said data, it would
be evident that 2062 candidates for the post of Sub-Inspector,
215 candidates for the post of Sergeant and 125 candidates for
the post of Assistant Superintendent of Jail (direct recruitment)
were selected. After publication of the final result, marks of all
the candidates, who had participated in the examination,
pursuant to Advertisement No.1/2019, was duly uploaded on the
Website of the Commission on 30.07.2021, with a notice
providing link for perusal of the marks by the candidates,
activated from 01.08.2021 to 15.08.2021. The copy of such
notice is placed on record as Annexure-E to the counter
affidavit. Referring thereto, it has further been submitted that
direction was given to all the candidates to download the mark-
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
32/43
sheet from the website of the Commission, as after 15.08.2021,
the link will become de-active.
16. The Commission in order to dispel the
confusion among the candidates regarding their non-selection,
as many candidates were found that despite having acquired cut
off marks, but their name did not find in the final list dated
17.06.2021, issued a notice in its website on 12.08.2021.
Information was given to all the candidates that in their marks-
sheet itself, in the remarks column it was mentioned; “not
selected for the post of PSI, ASJ, unfit for the post of Sergeant”,
meaning thereby such candidates are having lesser marks than
the candidates selected on the post of Sub-Inspector and on the
post of Assistant Superintendent Jail, therefore, their selection
was not made on the post of Police Sub-Inspector and Assistant
Superintendent Jail. Since those candidates have also failed in
PET for the post of Sergeant, hence such candidates even after
having more marks than the cut off marks have not been
selected on account of being failed for the post of Sergeant.
17. Adverting to the aforesaid facts, learned Senior
Advocate for the Commission, thus contended that the claim of
the petitioners to be appointed, as they are having more marks
than the cut off marks declared by the Commission is absolutely
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
33/43
misconceived. In order to crystallize the entire matters, a chart
has been prepared with respect to five writ petitioners, who have
annexed their admit cards with a view to demonstrate over all
rank and the rank of last candidate selected on the post of Police
Sub-Inspector, Assistant Superintendent Jail and Sergeant.
Similarly a chart, containing over all rank of the private
respondents has also been placed on record through the counter
affidavit that the writ petitioners are far below in over all rank
than the private respondents.
18. The contention of the petitioners that they are
not getting OMR sheet and other documents under Right to
Information Act is completely refuted by stating on oath that the
Commission is providing OMR sheet as well as question paper
and all other relevant information to the candidates, who have
approached the Commission under the RTI Act, 2005.
19. With regard to the contention of the petitioners
in respect of non-publication of category wise result, it is
answered that as per reservation policy, many of the candidates
for reserved category got placed in the General Category on the
basis of their own merit position in the Preliminary and Mains
Examination; thus when the result of the Preliminary and Mains
Examination was processed on the basis of 20 times and 6 times
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
34/43
of the advertised posts and the selected candidates of Mains
Examination upon clearing the PET got selected on the basis of
their merit position in open merit category as well as in their
respective category. However, none of the petitioners are able to
demonstrate that they have secured higher marks than the
selected candidates. Identical issue has also come up for
consideration before this Court in the case of Bihar Police
Subordinate Service Commission Vs. Ramesh Kumar &
Ors., reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 416 wherein the learned
Division Bench of this Court has been pleased to set aside the
order of the learned Single Judge, inter alia, on the ground the
students having become unsuccessful, cannot be permitted to
turn around and challenge the procedure of selection on the
ground of unfairness without any relevant materials in respect
thereof. The aforesaid proposition has also been emphasized in
the case of Ashok Kumar And Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.,
reported in (2017) 4 SCC 357.
20. Mr. Seho Shankar Prasad, learned SC-8
appearing on behalf of the State respondents has adopted the
contentions advanced on behalf of the Commission.
21. This Court has anxiously heard the learned
Advocate for the respective parties and also perused the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
35/43
materials available on record.
22. Before delving into the merit of this case, it
would be apt to highlight the legal position that when a
candidate appears at the examination without objection and
subsequently he is found to be unsuccessful, challenge to the
process is precluded, came to be crystallized in umpteen number
of the decisions of the Apex Court. In the case of Chandra
Prakash Tiwari and Ors vs Shakuntala Shukla and Ors.,
reported in (2002) 6 SCC 127, the Apex Court has observed that
question of entertaining a petition challenging the said
examination would not arise where a candidate has appeared
and participated after accepting all the terms and conditions, but
subsequently contended that the process of examination was
unfair or that there was lacuna therein, merely because the result
is not palatable.
23. In Union of India & Others vs S. Vinodh
Kumar & Others, reported in (2007) 8 SCC 100, the Apex
Court has held that it is well-settled that those candidates who
had taken part in the selection process knowing fully well the
procedure laid down therein were not entitled to question the
same. Emphasizing the aforenoted principle in the case of
Amlan Jyoti Borooah vs State of Assam & Ors, reported in
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
36/43
(2009) 3 SCC 227, the Apex Court further held that the
candidates knowing fully well the procedure laid down in the
selection process were not entitled to question the same, upon being
declared to be unsuccessful. In Manish Kumar Shahi vs. State of
Bihar & Ors., reported in (2010) 12 SCC 576 the Hon’ble
Supreme Court reiterating the principle as laid down in the case
of Madan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and
Ors., (1995) 3 SCC 486 and various other cases, has observed
as follows:
“16. We also agree with the High
Court that after having taken part in the process
of selection knowing fully well that more than
19% marks have been earmarked for viva voce
test, the petitioner is not entitled to challenge the
criteria or process of selection. Surely, if the
petitioner’s name had appeared in the merit list,
he would not have even dreamed of challenging
the selection. The petitioner invoked jurisdiction
of the High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India only after he found that his
name does not figure in the merit list prepared by
the Commission. This conduct of the petitioner
clearly disentitles him from questioning the
selection and the High Court did not commit any
error by refusing to entertain the writ petition..”
24. There is no quarrel with regard to settled
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
37/43
position that the selection process has to be conducted strictly in
accordance with the stipulation which need to be scrupulously
maintained. There cannot be any relaxation in the terms and
conditions of the Advertisement unless such power is
specifically reserved in the relevant rules and/or any
advertisement. Even if such power is existed, which should only
to be exercised after giving due publicity in order to ensure that
those candidates who become eligible due to the relaxation, are
afforded an equal opportunity to apply and compete, failing
which it would contrary to the mandate of quality contained in
Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India vide Bedanga
Talukdar vs Saifudaullah Khan & Ors., reported in (2011) 12
SCC 85.
25. The question whether the Rules of the game
could be changed in midway was considered by the Apex Court
in various decisions and recently has further been crystallized
by a Constitution Bench decision in the case of Tej Prakash
Pathak (supra).
“42. We, therefore, answer the reference in
the following terms:
(1) Recruitment process commences from
the issuance of the advertisement calling
for applications and ends with filling up of
vacancies;
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
38/43
(2) Eligibility criteria for being placed in
the Select List, notified at the
commencement of the recruitment process,
cannot be changed midway through the
recruitment process unless the extant Rules
so permit, or the advertisement, which is
not contrary to the extant Rules, so permit.
Even if such change is permissible under
the extant Rules or the advertisement, the
change would have to meet the
requirement of Article 14 of the
Constitution and satisfy the test of non-
arbitrariness;
(3) The decision in K. Manjusree (supra)
lays down good law and is not in conflict
with the decision in Subash Chander
Marwaha (supra). Subash Chander
Marwaha (supra) deals with the right to be
appointed from the Select List whereas K.
Manjusree (supra) deals with the right to
be placed in the Select List. The two cases
therefore deal with altogether different
issues;
(4) Recruiting bodies, subject to the extant
Rules, may devise appropriate procedure
for bringing the recruitment process to its
logical end provided the procedure so
adopted is transparent, non-discriminatory/
non-arbitrary and has a rational nexus to
the object sought to be achieved.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
39/43
(5) Extant Rules having statutory force are
binding on the recruiting body both in
terms of procedure and eligibility.
However, where the Rules are non-
existent, or silent, administrative
instructions may fill in the gaps;
(6) Placement in the select list gives no
indefeasible right to appointment. The
State or its instrumentality for bona fide
reasons may choose not to fill up the
vacancies. However, if vacancies exist, the
State or its instrumentality cannot
arbitrarily deny appointment to a person
within the zone of consideration in the
select list.”
26. Trite it is that the entire selection process and
the appointment is to be made as per the procedure prescribed
under the relevant Advertisement and the Rules; non-adherence
to which makes the entire selection process vulnerable to
interfere; such issue has been duly explicited and emphasized by
the Hon’ble Apex Court in various decisions, one of which is
Goa Public Service Commission vs Pankaj Rane & Ors.,
reported in (2022) 11 SCC 742.
27. In the background of the aforenoted settled
legal position, coming to the facts of the case at hand, it is true
that in terms of the Advertisement calling 20 times the number
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
40/43
of vacancy after Preliminary Examination and 6 times the
number of vacancy after Mains Examination was done, the
petitioners being successful in Preliminary Examination were
called for in Mains Examination and their name find place in the
list of successful candidate.
28. Hence, in the opinion of this Court, the
challenge to the procedure adopted in conducting Preliminary
and Mains Examination cannot be sustained only on account of
the fact that finally the petitioners did not find place in the final
merit list. It is only after the petitioners were unsuccessful in
getting the place in the final merit list, they filed the writ
petition. They did not raise a challenge either to Advertisement
or Preliminary and Mains Examination, presumably because
they were all successful in the examination.
29. The allegation of unfair on account of not
uploading the answer key and information providing answer
sheet does not appear to be palatable and justified in view of the
specific averment made in the counter affidavit. The admission
on the part of the Commission that the Commission is providing
OMR sheets as well as question paper and other relevant
necessary information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
All the more, this issue has been completely watered down by
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
41/43
various decisions of the Apex Court. In the case of Aditya
Bandopadhyay (supra), the Court ruled that it is always open
to a candidate to clear his doubt by moving an application under
Right to Information Act for supply of the answer book in order
to raise any such grievance.
30. This Court also does not find that after issuance
of advertisement at any stage, the rule of game is tinkered with
by reducing the cut off marks from 75.8% to 75%. It is well
explained by the Commission that in the process, total 15,231
candidates along with 357 Ex-servicemen candidates were
selected for PET, out of which only 6670 candidates finally
qualified in the PET in all respect, including the document
verification, which has been clearly mentioned in the final result
itself and on account of the said facts, the cut off marks of the
final list was round off, as more meritorious candidates having
secured more marks were disqualified in the PET, which
resulted in the change of the cut off marks in the final merit list.
Thus, in any event reducing the cut off marks from 75.8% to
75% cannot be said to be arbitrary and illegal; apart from the
same was in larger interest of the candidates and no prejudice is
caused to the petitioners.
31. In the opinion of this Court, with due respect,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
42/43
the ruling of the Constitution bench in the case of Tej Prakash
Pathak (Supra) and other documents cited by the learned
Advocate for the petitioners on this line do not get attracted in
the facts of this case. This Court finds substance in the stand of
the Commission, while furnishing a chart showing comparative
marks between the petitioners and the private respondents. The
petitioners have failed to produce any material to made out a
case that they have secured more marks than the private
respondents, who have arrayed in the representative capacity.
32. From the chart brought on record through the
counter affidavit, it is explicit that over all rank of the
petitioners are much below than the rank of last candidate
selected for the post of Police Sub-Inspector and Assistant
Superintendent Jail; and moreover, the candidates, who have
also failed in the PET for the post of Sergeant, such candidates
even after having more marks than the cut off marks have not
been selected on account of being failed for the post of
Sergeant.
33. On the basis of the pleadings and the materials
on record, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners have
failed to point out any illegality or irregularity or lapse in the
selection process, which warrant any interference in the matter.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2022 dt.25-03-2025
43/43
34. In view of the discussions made hereinabove
and the settled position in law, both the writ petitions failed.
35. The parties shall bear their own cost.
36. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed
of.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE 25.02.2025 Uploading Date 27.03.2025 Transmission Date NA
[ad_1]
Source link