The 2nd defendant in OS No.1501/2006 on the files of the III
Additional Munsiff’s Court, Ernakulam, a suit for partition, has come
up with the present appeal against the concurrent findings by the trial
court as well as the first appellate court, on the ground that both
courts went wrong in appreciating the facts as well as the law involved
in the case in a perverse manner.
2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are as
follows:
One Karthiayaniyamma and her four children consisted of a joint
family. In 1114 ME (Malayalam Era), a partition deed was executed
between Karthiayaniyamma and children. Ext.A1 is the certified copy
of the partition deed. As per the said partition deed, the property was
partitioned among Karthiayaniyamma and her children as follows: