Riyaz Ahmad Geelani vs Union Territory Through Police Station … on 18 August, 2025

0
3

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Riyaz Ahmad Geelani vs Union Territory Through Police Station … on 18 August, 2025

                                                             Serial No. 10
                                                             Regular Cause List
  HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                              AT SRINAGAR
                                   ...
                                CRM(M) 479/2025
                                CrlM(1155/2025)

RIYAZ AHMAD GEELANI

                                                             .........Petitioner(s)
                               Through:
                         Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, Sr. Adv. with
                         Mr. Anurag Verma, Adv.


                                Versus
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION HANDWARA AND ANR.

                                                            .......Respondent(s)

                                Through:

                         .
CORAM:
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
                                   ORDER

18.08.2025

1. Heard Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the

petitioner.

2. Through the medium of the instant petition filed under the provisions

of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short

BNSS), the petitioner has sought the setting aside of the order dated

29.07.2025 passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge,

Handwara (for short the trial court) in File No. 262/G titled as “UT of

J&K Th. P/S Handwara vs. Riyaz Ahmed Geelani” by virtue of which

order he has been charged for offences punishable under Sections

69,89,351(2) BNS in case FIR No. 15/2025 of Police Station

Handwara and his consequent discharge under said offences.

3. The case of the petitioner/accused is that he was arrested in case FIR

No. 15/2025 of Police Station Handwara for offences under Sections
69,89,351(2) BNS on 11.01.2025. That the FIR was registered on a

complaint filed by the respondent No. 2 who prior to the same had also

filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short the DV Act) against him

before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Handwara

pleading therein to be his wife as per the marriage having been taken

place on 11.07.2024. That he appeared before the concerned

Magistrate and filed objections to the said application. That he was

granted interim bail in the aforesaid case FIR. That the final

report/challan in respect of the aforementioned case FIR stands also

presented before the learned trial court. That the learned trial court

framed charges against him under Sections 69,89,351(2) BNS vide

order dated 29.07.2025 and has accordingly put him to trial in the case.

That he is innocent and has not committed any overt act which would

warrant his involvement in the said offences.

4. It is submitted by Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, learned Sr. Advocate that since

the respondent No. 2/complainant prior to the lodging of the

FIR/complaint, had preferred an application under Section 12 of the

DV Act before the concerned Magistrate thereby admitting her to be

the wife of the petitioner, therefore, the registration of the FIR against

him under Sections 69 BNS is bad under law. Learned Sr. counsel

further contended that the learned trial court framed charges against

the petitioner also under Sections 89,351(2) BNS without there being

any evidence at all. That the learned trial court in the impugned order

also discussed the arguments of the counsel for the petitioner/accused.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion

that the matter can be disposed of at this threshold stage by passing of
such appropriate orders which are not likely to prejudice the rights and

interests of any of the parties.

6. Learned Trial Court is empowered in view of the provisions of Section

403 BNSS to make a review of the impugned order in the light of the

facts and circumstances of the case and arguments put forth by the

learned counsel for the petitioner/accused. The charge otherwise also

can be altered in view of the provisions of Section 239 BNSS at any

stage before passing of the final judgment.

7. The matter is taken up for final disposal and is accordingly disposed of

with the direction to the learned trial court to re-visit the impugned

order in the facts and circumstances of the case, after affording a fresh

opportunity of being heard to both the parties and to pass the

appropriate orders warranted in the facto legal scenario of the case

without being influenced by its earlier observations.

8. Disposed of.

(MOHD YOUSUF WANI)
JUDGE
Srinagar
18.08.2025
“SAKEENA-PS”



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here