Rohit Goyal vs The State Of Jharkhand. … … Opposite … on 17 April, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Rohit Goyal vs The State Of Jharkhand. … … Opposite … on 17 April, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen

Bench: Ananda Sen

                                                        2025:JHHC:11669

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        A.B.A. No.2677 of 2024
                                 ------
     Rohit Goyal, aged about 34 years, Son of Binod Goyal, Resident
     of D.B. Road, Naya Bazar, PO & PS Jugsalai, District Singhbhum
     East (Jharkhand).                            ... ... Petitioner
                                 Versus
     The State of Jharkhand.                 ... ... Opposite Party
                                 ------
                      CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

——

For the Petitioner : Mr. P.A.S Pati, Advocate.
For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
For the OP No.2 : Mr. Praveen Jaiswal, Advocate

—–

10/ 17.04.2025

Heard the parties.

2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 and

440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been

preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences

registered under Sections 406, 417, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B

of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is alleged that an amount of Rs.120 lakh was taken

from SIDBI for purchase of machine but ultimately the

machines were not being purchased and fake invoices were

generated.

4. The petitioner is the son of both the Directors and is also

guarantor and promotor.

5. The fact which is admitted that now charge-sheet has

already been submitted against the petitioner and cognizance

has been taken. The fact that charge-sheet has been submitted

against the petitioner also suggest that it was not necessary to

take petitioner in custody during investigation.

1

2025:JHHC:11669

6. Since charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance

has been taken and there is now no scope of any investigation,

it would not be proper to reject this anticipatory bail

application.

7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands

allowed. The petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender

before the learned court below within four weeks from the date

of receipt of copy of this order and on the event of his

surrender or arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing

bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned

Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in connection with Jugsalai

P.S. Case No.20/2022 (G.R. No.1454 of 2023), subject to the

condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of

the petitioner and other should be a resident of State of

Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his name or in

the name of his ancestors in which he is having share and to

that effect, he has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court

indicating his share in the property.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

RKM/

2