Roop Ram Shukla vs . State Of Himachal Pradesh on 23 January, 2025

0
38

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Roop Ram Shukla vs . State Of Himachal Pradesh on 23 January, 2025

Roop Ram Shukla vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Cr.MP(M) No.164 of 2025

23.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukesh Sharma and Mr. Sunil Thakur, Advocates, for
the petitioner.

Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.

Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file status

report.

List on 24.02.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall

also file Status report.

The petitioner-accused apprehends his arrest in a case

registered against him vide FIR No.0006/2025 dated 06.01.2025,

under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, at

Police Station, Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla, Himachal

Pradesh.

In view of the averments in the application and also the

submissions made by learned counsel, it is directed that in the

event of arrest of the petitioner-accused in this case, he shall be

released on bail subject to him furnishing personal bonds in the

sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer,

subject to following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall appear before
the Investigating Officer, Police Station, Rampur
Bushehar, District Shimla, on 24.01.2025 at 11.30
a.m;

(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation of case as and
when called for by the Investigating Officer in
accordance with law;

(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the investigation in any
manner whatsoever;

(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the complainants,
threaten or browbeat them or to use any pressure
tactics in any manner whatsoever;

(v). Petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court;

(vii). Petitioner shall not make any inducement threat or
promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating officer
or any person acquainted with the facts of the case to
dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court
or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

( Bipin C. Negi )
January 23, 2025 (KS) Vacation Judge

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here