Rouf Ahmad Wani vs Union Territory Of J And K And on 10 March, 2025

0
5

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Rouf Ahmad Wani vs Union Territory Of J And K And on 10 March, 2025

Author: Rahul Bharti

Bench: Rahul Bharti

                                                S.No.10
                                                Regular List
  IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT SRINAGAR

                           HCP 43/2025
                           CM(978/2025)
                           CM(979/2025)
ROUF AHMAD WANI                            ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)

Through: Mr. Arif Hussain Bhat, Advocate

                                 Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND                         ...Respondent(s)
ORS.
Through: Mr. S.S. Kala, AAG

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
                              ORDER

10-03-2025

1. Bearing an apprehension that J&K Public Safety

Act 1978 has been set into effect by the District

Police and the District Magistrate Anantnag as a

matter of witch-hunt against the petitioner without

the petitioner having indulged in any act of omission

or commission falling within the scope of mischief

of section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978, the

petitioner came forward with the present writ

petition bearing a plea that by purported reference to

an order No. 26/DMA/PSA/DET/2024 dated 24-10-

2024 passed by the District Magistrate Anantnag,

the petitioner is sought to be chased and detained

under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 which is
going to seriously peril the personal liberty of the

petitioner in case of the said detention order getting

executed upon him. Thus, in essence the writ

petition came to be instituted at the pre-execution

stage of detention order No.

26/DMA/PSA/DET/2024 dated 24-10-2024.

2. This Court, in terms of an order dated 05-03-2025,

called upon the District Magistrate Anantnag to

place on record a copy of the detention order as

referred in the writ petition to confirm the fact as to

whether such order relates to the petitioner or is

meant for some other person.

3. Today, Mr. S. S. Kala, learned AAG, has come

forward with a copy of order No.

26/DMA/PSA/DET/2024 dated 24-10-2024 issued

by the District Magistrate Anantnag whereby the

petitioner namely Rouf Ahmad Wani @ Faheem son

of late Abdul Rashid Wani resident of Dooru

Shahabad, District Anantnag has been ordered to be

detained under the J & K Public Safety Act, 1978 in

order to prevent him from acting in a manner
prejudicial to the maintenance of public order of UT

of J&K.

4. The District Magistrate, Anantnag has purportedly

acted upon a dossier submitted by the Senior

Superintendent of Police (SSP), Anantnag vide

letter No. CS/71/2024/19207-12 dated 10-09-2024.

In the grounds of detention accompanying the order

of detention so produced, the antecedents of the

petitioner being adversely commented upon are all

relatable to the cases of 2005/2006/2007 all being

stale by point of reference so as not to constitute any

live basis for preventive detention of the petitioner

only FIR No. 16/2020 under section 420/120-B of

the Indian Penal Code of the Police Station Achabal

is the latest reference point against the petitioner.

5. Offence under section 420 India Penal Code by no

stretch of legal reasoning and the authority of law

obtaining on the subject enable preventive detention

of a person. Maintenance of Public Order is

distinctly placed vis-à-vis the Law and Order

problem and therefore, this Court finds a case made

out for indulgence.

6. Let response be filed to the writ petition by the

respondents along with production of the file

relatable to the passing of the detention order No.

26/DMA/PSA/DET/2024 dated 24-10-2024.

7. The detention order produced, today, by Mr. S.S.

Kala is taken on record.

8. List on 21st April, 2025.

9. In the meantime, the respondents are directed not to

detain the petitioner in execution of detention order

No. 26/DMA/PSA/DET/2024 dated 24-10-2024

passed by the District Magistrate Anantnag. This

order is, however, subject to objections and till next

date of hearing before the Bench.

(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR:

10-03-2025
Mubashir



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here