S.A.G.Ramasamy Nadar vs The Recovery Officer on 28 July, 2025

0
23

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

second respondent Bank to refund the sale consideration amount of Rs.

10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) paid towards the Tender-cum-Auction sale

dated 23.03.2011 and sale certificate registration charges, stamp duty and other

expenses totally Rs.12,00,000/- together with interest at 24% per annum from the

date of deposit until the date of realization.

2. Admittedly, the proceedings under the provisions of the

“Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Security Interest Act, 2002” (hereinafter referred to as “SARFAESI Act”) has

been initiated and the recovery officer passed the orders. The proceedings under

the SARFAESI Act is susceptible to an appeal under the said Act and therefore,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 12:41:41 pm )

no Writ is maintainable in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of

India in the case of Celir LLP Vs. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Private Limited and

others reported in (2024) 2 SCC 1, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India

held that the High Court was not justified in exercising the writ jurisdiction under

Article 226 of Constitution of India, since efficacious alternative remedy is

contemplated under the provisions of SARFAESI Act. Paragraph Nos.97, 98, 110

and 110.1, which are relevant in this context, stand extracted hereunder:

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here