S.Shahanaz Parveen vs S.Abdul Rahim on 24 December, 2024

0
44

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

S.Shahanaz Parveen vs S.Abdul Rahim on 24 December, 2024

Q`.I
   `\in


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV


                    TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBE

                            ll^/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                          :PRESENT:
                                                                                   t ttrfu
          THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

                                        IANo. 2OF2024

                                              lN
                                                                             /
                                     SA NO: 511 OF 2024
          Betwee n :
             1. S.ShahanazParveen, W/o. S.MasthanSaheb, Aged about 41 years,
                Muslim, House-wife, D.No.8/314, Almaspeta Street, Kadapa City and
                District.

             2. S. Shakeera Praveen, , D/o. S.ShafeemuIIaSaheb, Aged about 35

                years, Muslim, D.No.8/314, Almaspeta Street, Kadapa City and District.
                                                                        ...Petitioner(s)

                                                       (Petitioner in SA 511 OF 2024
                                                             on the file of High Court)
                                             AND
             1. S.AbduI Rahim, S/o. Sheik AbduI, Razack, Aged about 68 year, Muslim,
                Retired Hindi Pandit,13/2012, LoharFakruddin Street, Kadapa City.

            2. . SayyidaShagupthaYasmin, W/o. Mohammad HafijurRehiman, aged
                about 46 years, Muslim, House wife, R/o. Door No 10/636-1, Bellam
                Mandy Street, Kadapa.
            3. Jeenathunnisa, W/o. Sheik ShafeefullaSaheb,I Aged about 61 years,
                Muslim, House-wife, D.No.8/314, Almaspeta Street, Kadapa City and
                District.

                                                                     ...Respondent(s)

                                                                (Respondents in-do-)
        Petition   under Section   151   of CPC     is filed     praying      that       in   the
i circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the

 petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of judgment
 and decree in A.S. No. 63/2018, dated 08-09-2023 VI Additional District

 Judge, Kadapa, Pending disposal of SA No. 511 of 2024, on the file of the
 High Court.



       The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the

 grounds filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated
 21.08.2024, 25.09.2024, 23.10.2024 & 07.ll.2024 made herein and upon

 hearing the arguments of Sri Haranadha Raju Katta, Advocate for Petitioners,
 the court made the following order;
 ORDER:

I’Today when the matter is called for hearing, learned counsel for

the appellants is present through virtual mode.

lt is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that, /
the present matter may be adjourned to after Pongal Vacation, 2025.

Interim Order granted earlier by this Court shall extend till the next
_ ^l
date of hearing.” rr-

sd/: B. PRASADA- RAO
ASSISTANT ‘REGISTRA.R -I-

                                  //TRUE COPY//
                                                                          ted4#zts*~~        _~_~r~~
                                                  For
                                                                 sE+CT!ON OFFICE.R
To,

1. The VI Additional District Judge, Kadapa.

2. One CC to SRl. HARANADHA RAJU KATTA Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri Prakash Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One spare copy
HIGH COURT

VGKR, J

DATED: 24/12/2024

ORDER

IA NO.2 OF 2024
lN

SA.No.511 of 2024

lNTERIM ORDER EXTENDED

grng¥{ffi;se* `,£*?\\
(fl ® lJfiN 20?5



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here