Sachin Meena, Son Of Shri Khemchand … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:19722) on 9 May, 2025

0
116

[ad_1]

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Sachin Meena, Son Of Shri Khemchand … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:19722) on 9 May, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:19722]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6669/2024

1.       Sachin Meena, Son Of Shri Khemchand Meena, Aged
         About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Nayabass, Police
         Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.       Netram, Son Of Shri Girraj Prjapat, Resident Of Village
         Doba Akbarpur, Police Station Akbarpur, District Aalwar
         (Raj.)
3.       Amit, Son Of Shri Shivkumar Meena, Resident Of 147,
         Near Shiv Mandir Transformers Street, Nayabass, Police
         Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar (Raj.)
4.       Aakash Sain, Son Of Shri Sureshchand, Resident Of
         Prithivepura, Police Station Malakhera, District Alwar
         (Raj.)
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.       Devendra Kumar Son Of Shri Rameshavar Dayal, Resident
         Of Tihali, Tijara, District Kherthal, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Kumar Chhawal
For State : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore with
Mr. Om Prakash, ASI, PS Aravali
Vihar, Alwar
For Complainant : Mr. Honey Saini for
Mr. Shyam Sunder Varma

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

09/05/2025

This petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is filed with a

prayer to quash the FIR No. 611/2023 registered at Police Station

Aravali Vihar District Alwar for offences under Sections 323, 341,

and 307 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between

the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.

(Downloaded on 15/05/2025 at 09:54:31 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:19722] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6669/2024]

Investigating Officer has marked presence in the Court and

has submitted that though no criminal antecedents are registered

against the petitioners, however in the investigation report it is

reflected that victim was hospitalized for 10 days and has

sustained life threatening injury on head and remained

unconscious for a long period of time.

Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is of the opinion that the instant matter does not

fall under the parameters of compromise.

Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. Pending

application(s), if any, stand dismissed.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /214

(Downloaded on 15/05/2025 at 09:54:31 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here