Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Saddeek @ Sadeek S/O Ibraheem vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:20370) on 14 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JP:20370]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5352/2025
Saddeek @ Sadeek S/o Ibraheem, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Ward No. 13, Indrawas Mandana, District Kota, Rajasthan. (At
Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bobby Dutta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order
14/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under
Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0146/2024 registered at Police
Station-Papada, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections 8,
18, 29 of the NDPS Act and later on converted Sections 8/18, 8/29
of the NDPS Act, Section 42 of the Prisons Act and Sections
319(2), 345(3), 303(2), 317(2), 238(c) and 61(2)(a) of the BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that
the recovery was affected from open place. At that time, the
petitioner was not present on the spot. Other co-accused-
Surendra Singh and Ramnath have already been enlarged on bail
by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. So called contraband is
(Downloaded on 19/05/2025 at 09:54:12 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:20370] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5352/2025]
below the commercial quantity and there are no criminal
antecedents against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been
filed. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 19.10.2024. The trial
of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application
of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material
available on record and deliberating all the facts and
circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on
the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of
bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S.
is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Saddeek @
Sadeek S/o Ibraheem shall be released on bail on his furnishing
a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for
his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of
the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J
Anil Sharma/178
(Downloaded on 19/05/2025 at 09:54:12 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link