Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Sahkul S/O Suleman vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23099) on 11 June, 2025
Author: Anand Sharma
Bench: Anand Sharma
[2025:RJ-JP:23099]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6374/2025
Sahkul S/o Suleman, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Jurharee,
Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, (Rajasthan). (Currently In
Sub-Jail, Deeg, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6383/2025
Tarif S/o Ayyub, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station
Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub
Jail, Deeg)
—-Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)
Order
11/06/2025
1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused-
petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No.
130/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for
the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338,
336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of BNS
and under Section 66D of IT Act.
(Downloaded on 27/06/2025 at 10:57:20 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23099] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6374/2025]
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the
accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated only on account
of suspicion and possessing mobile, whereas they have committed
no offence whatsoever. Learned counsel further submits that the
the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate. Counsel also
submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-
petitioners and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since
25.04.2025. Trial is likely to take considerably long time.
Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on
bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these
bail applications.
4. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by
the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars
since 25.04.2025 and they would no longer be required for
custodial interrogation, this Court without expressing any opinion
on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to
enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The
accused-petitioners Sahkul S/o Suleman & Tarif S/o Ayyub
shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 130/2025
registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg on furnishing a
personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of
the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also
follow the conditions as under:-
(Downloaded on 27/06/2025 at 10:57:20 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23099] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6374/2025]
(i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence
the witnesses in the case.
(ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of
the Court.
(iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and
every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is
exempted by the trial Court.
7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground
for cancellation of bail would arise.
8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in connected
case file.
(ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J
DIVYA /365-366
(Downloaded on 27/06/2025 at 10:57:20 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)