Sahnur Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 4 June, 2025

0
6

Patna High Court – Orders

Sahnur Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 4 June, 2025

Author: Anshuman

Bench: Anshuman

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34589 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2024 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Sahnur Alam S/o Majharul Haque @ Majaharul Haque @ Majrul Haque R/o
                 Village- Patilwa, P.S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Satya Prakash Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Rajesh Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-06-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

Baisi P.S. Case No. 147/2024 lodged on 12.06.2024 under

Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the

Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the present FIR has

been lodged against unknown accused persons on the allegation

of committing dacoity.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is

further submitted that the name of the petitioner has surfaced

solely in the confessional statement of a co-accused. No

recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner,

nor has he been subjected to a Test Identification Parade. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34589 of 2025(2) dt.04-06-2025
2/3

petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2025 and is also implicated

in three other criminal cases.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer

for bail and submits that the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

while rejecting the petitioner’s bail application, observed that

the petitioner is a habitual offender and is involved in three

other criminal cases of similar nature. Although it is admitted

that no recovery has been made from the petitioner and he has

not been subjected to a Test Identification Parade, his name has

figured in the confessional statement of a co-accused.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case

and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above

named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/-

(Rupees Thirty thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of

the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnea, in

connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 147/2024, subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 480(3) of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of

the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his

bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34589 of 2025(2) dt.04-06-2025
3/3

before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

bonds by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

police station every month for one year to mark attendance;

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence,

failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

cancellation of the bail bonds; and

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

7. The learned court below shall release the petitioner

on bail only after framing of charge, if not framed as well as on

being satisfied that the petitioner is not absconding in any of the

cases as mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the petition as under :-

1. Amour P.S. Case No. 374/2024.

2. Angarh P.S. Case No. 17/2024, and

3. Angarh P.S. Case No. 30/2024.

(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here