[ad_1]
Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Sajedabanu Munnabhai Shekh @ Saraswati … vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 August, 2025
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(@ SLP(CRL.) NO. 8135/2025)
SAJEDABANU MUNNABHAI SHEKH @ SARASWATI
MANOJ RAJUBHAI RAJPUT Appellant(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(@ SLP(CRL.) NO. 10026/2025)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
These appeals challenge the judgments and orders
dated 17.04.2025 and 24.04.2025 passed by the High Court
of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in R/Criminal Misc. Application
No. 7482 of 2025 and R/Criminal Misc. Application
No.8084/2025 respectively.
The appellants herein have been booked for the crime
registered pursuant to FIR No. 11191011230279/2023 dated
30.10.2023 lodged with DCB Police Station, Ahmedabad City,
with respect to offences punishable under Sections 8(c),
22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985 (for short “NDPS Act”).
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
RADHA SHARMA
Date: 2025.08.04
16:55:24 IST
Reason:
1
Applications seeking regular bail having been
rejected by the High Court vide impugned orders dated
17.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, the appellants have preferred
the instant appeals.
By orders dated 28-05-2025 and 21.07.2025, notices
were issued in both the matters.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in support
of the appeals and learned counsel for the respondent-
State and perused the material on record.
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the
appellants are wife and husband; that the allegations as
against the appellants herein are not true. However,
charges have been framed and the trial is proceeding; that
there are as many as thirty witnesses to be examined, out
of whom only three have been examined; but the appellants
have been in jail since 30.10.2023 and in another two
-three months’ time it would be two years. The continuous
incarceration of the appellants would be a harassment to
them in the event they are to be ultimately acquitted as
they have a good case on merits. In the circumstances
learned counsel for the appellants submitted the impugned
orders may be set aside and the relief of bail may be
granted to the appellants herein.
2
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent
opposed the grant of relief of bail to the appellants
herein by contending that contraband substance being
25.390 kilograms of ganja was recovered and seized from
them; that the appellants have been actively involved in
the supply and trade of the narcotic substance; that if
this Court is to issue a direction to the concerned
Special Court for conclusion of the trial expeditiously,
the same would be complied with. Hence, there is no merit
in these appeals.
Considering the facts on record, in our view, the
case for bail is made out.
We, therefore, allow these appeals and direct as
under:
“The appellants shall be produced before the
concerned Trial Court as early as possible and the
Trial Court shall release them on bail, subject to
such conditions as it may deem appropriate to
impose to ensure their presence in the proceedings
arising out of FIR/Case No. 11191011230279/2023
dated 30.10.2023 mentioned above.”It is directed that the appellants shall extend
complete cooperation in the ensuing trial.
3
The appellants shall not misuse their liberty and
shall not in any way influence the witnesses or tamper
with the material on record.
Any infraction of the conditions shall entail
cancellation of bail granted to the appellants.
With the aforesaid directions, the Criminal Appeals
are allowed.
………………………………………………………,J.
( B.V. NAGARATHNA )
…………………………………………………………,J.
( K.V. VISWANATHAN )
NEW DELHI;
AUGUST 04, 2025
4
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-E
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8135/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-04-2025
in CRMA No. 7482/2025 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
Ahmedabad]SAJEDABANU MUNNABHAI SHEKH @ SARASWATI
MANOJ RAJUBHAI RAJPUT Petitioner(s)VERSUS
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION
IA No. 134021/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 10026/2025 (II-E)
(IA No. 160844/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No. 160845/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)Date : 04-08-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ali Asghar Rahim, Adv.
Mr. Mohsin Rahim, Adv.
Ms. Tania Tamanna, Adv.
Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR
Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR
Ms. Saumya Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Animesh Rajoriya, Adv.
Mr. Akash Kishore, Adv.
Mr. Kishan Prajapati, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR
Mr. Rishi Yadav, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E RLeave granted.
5
The Criminal Appeals are allowed in terms of the
signed order which is placed on the file.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(RADHA SHARMA) (DIVYA BABBAR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
6
[ad_2]
Source link
