Sajid S/O Shri Aalam vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:2847) on 20 January, 2025

0
44

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Sajid S/O Shri Aalam vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:2847) on 20 January, 2025

Author: Ashok Kumar Jain

Bench: Ashok Kumar Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:2847]

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                     BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 880/2025

Khurshid S/o Shri Bhartu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village
Chandupura, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (At Present
Confined In Central Jail Sewar).
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent
                              Connected With
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 881/2025
Sajid S/o Shri Aalam, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Peelsoo, Police
Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (At Present Confined In Central
Jail Bharatpur).
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

                                     Order

20/01/2025

1.     These two bail applications were preferred on behalf of

petitioners- Khurshid and Sajid in a matter arising out of FIR no.

99/2024 dated 12.06.2024 registered at P.S. Gopalgarh, District

Deeg wherein after filing of charge-sheet both the accused were

charged under Sections 419, 420, 384, 467, 468, 471, 411, 120-B

IPC and Section 66-D of IT Act.




                     (Downloaded on 27/01/2025 at 10:12:40 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JP:2847]                   (2 of 3)                         [CRLMB-880/2025]



2.    Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners

are innocent and they were falsely implicated by police. He

submits that on last occasion, bail of Khurshid was dismissed on

24.10.2024 whereas bail of Sajid was dismissed on 05.08.2024.

He further submits that after dismissal of bail application by this

Hon'ble Court, the trial court has framed the charges and now the

petitioners are facing trial before the trial court. He also submits

that the petitioners are sole breadearners of their families and the

disposal of the case will take its own time. At last, he submitted

that the petitioners accused assures the Hon'ble Court that they

will not repeat their crime or indulge in any of the cyber criminal

activity. He further submits that they are ready to abide by any

condition imposed by this Hon'ble Court.

3.    Aforesaid contentions        were        opposed          by   learned   Public

Prosecutor.

4. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.

5. On 11.06.2024 during operation 5-6 persons with mobile

were intercepted and on enquiry the police has found that they

were involved in cyber criminal activity including cyber bulling,

sextortion and digital fraud etc. After the proceedings FIR no.

99/2024 was registered at P.S. Gopalgarh, District Deeg and after

enquiry a charge-sheet was has been filed against both the

petitioners. The petitioners were already charged by learned trial

court on 03.12.2024. The bail application was dismissed by

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaman on 24.12.2024.

6. A perusal of reasons assigned in order dated 05.08.2024 in

bail application no. 7929/2024 and order dated 24.10.2024 in bail

(Downloaded on 27/01/2025 at 10:12:40 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:2847] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-880/2025]

application no. 13175/2024 clearly indicates that the petitioners

were involved in cyber criminal activity such as cheating,

sextortion, cyber bulling. For last few year, District Deeg and

Kaman area of Bharatpur came on the map of cyber criminal

activities. A large number of cyber criminal activities were

committed as criminals residing in these areas and victims across

the country.

7. After dismissal of last bail application only charge has been

framed and no evidence has been recorded so far, therefore,

looking to gravity of the matter, particularly chances of recurrence

of involvement in same criminal activity after release on bail, I am

not inclined to grant bail to these two petitioners. The trial court is

expected to expedite the trial.

8. In view of aforesaid, the bail applications preferred by

Khurshid and Sajid are hereby dismissed. The trial court is

directed to expedite the trial and make all endeavour to dispose of

the criminal case as early as possible.

9. Office is directed to send a copy by e-mail to the trial court.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

CHETNA BEHRANI /4-5

(Downloaded on 27/01/2025 at 10:12:40 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here