Sakher Ali Laskar @ Raju vs Unknown on 30 April, 2025

0
2

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sakher Ali Laskar @ Raju vs Unknown on 30 April, 2025

30.04.2025
Item No.15.

Daily List
Court No.39
Mithun

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

CRM (M) 258 of 2025

In re : An Application under Section 439 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973 or Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to in connection with
Canning Police Station Case No.418 of 2019 dated 28.07.2019
under Sections 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code and
subsequently charge sheeted being Canning PS Charge Sheet
No.02 of 2020 dated 22.01.2020 under Sections
342
/343/344/346/363/366A/368/370/370A/372/120B/109
of Indian Penal Code read with Section 63/4/5/6/7/9 of
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1965 read with Sections 6/17
of POCSO Act ..

-And-

In the matter of : Sakher Ali Laskar @ Raju
[[
… Petitioner
Mr. Joy Chakraborty,
Mr. Sandip Dinda
…for the petitioner

Mrs. Sayanti Santra,
Mr. Dipankar Mahata
… …for the State

Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks accommodation

to serve upon the de facto complainant/victim.

Learned Advocate for the State also submits that the Case

Diary has not been produced.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner is directed to file

affidavit-of-service on the returnable date.

State is directed to effect service and file a service report

on the returnable date. In the notice to be served by the State, it

should be mentioned that the de facto complainant/victim has a
2

right to be represented through a lawyer to be engaged by the

Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee for which no cost

need be borne by the de facto complainant/victim. The notice

should be in a language which the de facto complainant /victim

can comprehend.

State is also directed to file status report of the trial on

the returnable date. In the status report to be filed, the State

shall indicate the stage of the trial, the number of charge sheet

named witnesses, the number of witnesses examined so far, how

many more witnesses the prosecution proposes to examine,

whether or not the petitioner has criminal antecedents and any

other relevant fact.

List this matter on 7th May, 2025.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here