Jharkhand High Court
Samiruddin Ansari @ Samruddin Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 23 June, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
( 2025:JHHC:16590 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5005 of 2025
------
Samiruddin Ansari @ Samruddin Ansari, aged about 47 years, S/o
Abdul Rahman Ansari @ Rahman Minya, R/o Ledatand, Madaidih,
P.O. & P.S.-Topchanchi, Dist.-Dhanbad.
…. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party
——
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
——
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate
: Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P
——
Order No.02 Dated- 23-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with
Topchanchi P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 326, 506, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common
intention with the co-accused person committed murder of the son of the
informant namely Ehtesaam. It is submitted that the allegation against the
petitioner is false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is also
submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the
trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in
custody since 28.03.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail
application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the
prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view, the direct allegation
against the petitioner of assaulting inter alia the deceased Ehtesaam;
besides the two other sons of the informant; there is every chance of the
petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. It
is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail.
Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as
well as the chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with
evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the
petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named
petitioner is rejected.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Abhiraj/