Sandeep Kumar vs . State Of Hp on 20 January, 2025

0
96

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Sandeep Kumar vs . State Of Hp on 20 January, 2025

Sandeep Kumar Vs. State of HP

Cr. MP(M) No.139 of 2025

20.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Sr. Advocate with M/s
Vivekanand Negi and Anubhuti Sharma,
Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma & Mr. Harinder Rawat,
Addl. Advocates General with Mr. Manish
Thakur and Ms. Niyati Mohan, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.

Notice. Mr. Harinder Rawat, learned Addl.

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondent and seeks time to file status

report. Status report be filed on or before the next date

of hearing.

List on 25.02.2025.

The petitioner-accused apprehends his arrest

in a case registered against him vide FIR No.205/2024

dated 17.11.2024, under Sections 132, 121 and 221 of

Bhartiya Nyaya Sahinta (BNS), at Police Station Shimla

West, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

In view of the averments in the application and

also the submissions made by learned counsel, it is

directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-

accused in this case, he shall be released on bail subject to

his furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-

with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the

arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to

following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall
appear before the Investigating Officer,
Police Station Shimla West, District
Shimla, H.P. on 21.1.2025, at 11.00 a.m;

(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation
of case as and when called for by the
Investigating Officer in accordance with
law;

(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the
investigation in any manner whatsoever;

(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the
complainant, threaten or browbeat them
or to use any pressure tactics in any
manner whatsoever;

(v). Petitioner shall not leave India
without prior permission of the Court;

(vi). Petitioner shall not make any
inducement threat or promise, directly or
indirectly, to the investigating officer or
any person acquainted with the facts of
the case to dissuade him/her from
disclosing such facts to the Court or any
Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(Bipin C. Negi)
Vacation Judge
20th January, 2025
(Gaurav Rawat)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here