[ad_1]
Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Sanjay Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 28 July, 2025
Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar
1
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10095/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-05-2025
in CRMABA No. 13943/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
SANJAY SINGH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
FOR ADMISSION
IA No. 161634/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 162609/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 162608/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/
FACTS/ANNEXURES
Date : 28-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, AOR
Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.
Ms. Ridhima Singh, Adv.
Ms. Pranshoo Goyal, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The petitioner is an accused in a case punishable under
Sections 363, 366, of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the
POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. Apprehending his
arrest, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory
Signature Not Verified
bail.
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2025.07.30
18:30:23 IST
Reason:
It is informed to this Court that the petitioner was granted
interim bail by the High Court vide order dated 01.02.2024.
2
Thereafter, the chargesheet was filed. Though the petitioner was
not named in the FIR, but on an application filed under Section 319
by the prosecution, he was summoned, in which he had got an
anticipatory bail by the High Court.
Subsequently, the High Court has cancelled the bail for the
reason that the petitioner was not cooperating in the trial.
However, we have gone through the ordersheets of the trial court
from 07.02.2024 to 08.05.2025 which reveals that the petitioner has
been attending the court.
Under these circumstances, learned senior counsel appearing
for the petitioner would argue that there was no occasion to pass
such an order. Presently we set aside the order of the High Court,
but we direct the petitioner to seek regular bail from the court
concerned, as that would be the appropriate procedure the
petitioner must follow under the law. Since the trial has
commenced, the bail has to be considered by the trial court
considering, inter alia, that the petitioner is cooperating and
attending the trial, as it is being argued.
The petitioner shall move an application for bail before the
trial court concerned within one week from today. Till the bail
application is decided by the trial court, the interim protection
from arrest is granted to the petitioner shall continue, in
connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 06 of 2020 dated 14.01.2020
registered at Police Station Trilokpur, District Siddharthnagar,
Uttar Pradesh.
3
In view of above, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of.
Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed
of.
(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
[ad_2]
Source link