further submitted that the objections were of
no substance as it was nothing but narration
of the fact about conversion of the land and
permission to raise construction, etc.
I have considered the submissions made
by learned counsel for the parties and perused
the record.
An argument in reference to Section 5A
of the Act of 1894 has been raised. The
argument for it would not be available
to those, who failed to submit objections. It is
in view of the catena of judgments referred by
the respondents. The issue now remains for
those, who raised objections under Section 5A
of the Act of 1894.
[ad_1]
Source link