Santok Singh vs Shri Alok on 23 January, 2025

inkinccorporation@gmail.com

January 24, 2025

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Santok Singh vs Shri Alok on 23 January, 2025

Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2025:RJ-JD:4372]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 42/2021

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.715/2020

Rajendra Singh Chhaba, R/o Village Post Sarmaliya, Tehsil
Beawar, District Ajmer (Raj.).

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Managing Director, Rajasthan State
Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur.

2. Raghuveer Singh Rajawat, Chief Manager/depot Manager,
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Beawar
Depot.

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukesh Bhati
Mr. Mukesh Vyas
Mr. S.K.Poonia
Mr. Sushil Solanki
Mr. S.K.Verma
Mr. Bhanwar Singh Deora
Mr. Irfan Gouri
Mr. Naresh Kumar for
Mr. Rajesh Kumar
Mr. Narendra Thanvi
Mr. Devendra Kumar Soni
Mr. Shardul Singh
Mr. Kailash Trivedi
Mr. H.S. Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit
Mr. Shashank Sharma
Mr. Suniel Purohit
Mr. PR Singh
Mr. Shankar Singh
Mr. Avin Kumar Chhangani
Mr. Navdeep Dadhich

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
23/01/2025

1. Present contempt petition so also other petitions enlisted in

the Schedule appended herewith which involve identical allegation

(Downloaded on 23/01/2025 at 11:30:31 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:4372] (2 of 6) [WCP-42/2021]

and facts are being disposed of conjointly by this Common order.

The Schedule shall be treated as part and parcel of the order

instant.

2. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the cases be

disposed of in terms of the order dated 10.12.2024 which this

Court has passed in S.B. Writ Contempt Petition

No.1027/2018 : Dungav Ram Vs. Shri Raj Hans Upadhyay &

Ors.

3. The directions given in the case of Dungav Ram (supra) are

reproduced hereinbelow for the sake of convenience and clarity:-

“(i) All the retired employees [who had filed
their claims pursuant to order dated 07.05.2024
passed in the case of Dungav Ram (S.B. Writ
Contempt No. 1027/2018) or the order passed in
the case of Tara Chand Panchal (S.B. Writ
Contempt No. 1099/2019)] shall file their
objection(s)/claim(s) for determination of their
retiral dues and other benefits within a period of
two months.

(ii) The claims be filed in the office of the Chief
Manager of their respective depot (from which
depot the concerned employee has retired) in
two sets. It will be required of the Chief
Manager to give receipt of the claims so filed
with seal and date.

(iii) The Managing Director of the respondent –

Corporation shall within two months from today
nominate one retired accountant or higher
official (Retd.) at each depot, to adjudicate the
claims so filed.

(iv) Such nominated retired employee shall
work as an ‘Arbitrator’.

(Downloaded on 23/01/2025 at 11:30:32 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:4372] (3 of 6) [WCP-42/2021]

(v) It will be required of the Chief Manager of
each Depot to provide a befitting place where
the Arbitrator can have his sitting/hearing.

(vi) All the claims filed by the employees shall
be sent to the Arbitrator, who shall fix the date
of hearing as per his convenience under
intimation to both the parties.

(vii) It will be required of the respondent –
Corporation to make entire service record of
each of the employees, whichever is necessary
for the purpose of determination of claim,
available to the Arbitrator.

(viii) An honorarium of Rs.500/- shall be paid by
each of the employees/claimants to the
Arbitrator, while the Corporation shall also pay
equal amount to him.

(ix) Out of the amount mentioned in clause

(viii) above, half of the amount (Rs.250/-) shall
be paid by both the parties to the Arbitrator at
the time of first hearing. The remaining amount
of (Rs.250/- each) shall be paid by the parties
immediately before the final award is passed by
the Arbitrator.

(x) The respondent – Corporation shall also be
free to file its objections regarding the claim so
lodged by the employees.

(xi) The Arbitrator shall take summary
proceedings and pass award indicating therein
the claim wise details of the amount payable.

(xii) With the consent of all the parties, it is
hereby ordered that the determination so made
by the said Arbitrator shall be final and binding
on all the parties. No legal remedy against such
order shall be permissible to any party.

(Downloaded on 23/01/2025 at 11:30:32 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:4372] (4 of 6) [WCP-42/2021]

(xiii) Once the amount is determined by the
Arbitrator, it will be required of the respondent –
Corporation to pay the same on the basis of the
priority as given in the circular dated
03.11.2021 issued by the Corporation.

(xiv) Needless to mention that in case of a
deceased employee his wife or legal
representative shall be free to pursue the claim.

4. Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.

5. All the captioned contempt petitions stand disposed of with

same directions as has been given in the case of Dungav Ram

(supra).

(DINESH MEHTA),J
298 & other matters-akansha/-Mak/-

(Downloaded on 23/01/2025 at 11:30:32 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:4372] (5 of 6) [WCP-42/2021]

SCHEDULE
S.Nos. Item Nos. S.B. Writ Contempt Party Names
Petition Nos.

1. 297 18/2021 Krishan Gopal Sharma Vs.
Mr. Rajeshwar Singh & Ors.

2. 296 540/2020 Kanti lal Jain Vs. Mr. Naveen
Jain & Ors.

3. 285 838/2019 Narpat Singh Vs. Miss Shuchi
Sharma & Ors.