Santosh Kumar Pandey @ Santosh Pandey vs The State Of Bihar on 22 August, 2025

0
3

Patna High Court – Orders

Santosh Kumar Pandey @ Santosh Pandey vs The State Of Bihar on 22 August, 2025

Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha

Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42520 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Kumar Pandey @ Santosh Pandey, S/o Rameshwar Pandey, Resident
                 of Village- Mishrauliya Dah, P.S.- Govindganj, Distt-East Champaran, Bihar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Swarnima, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-08-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection

with Govindganj P.S. Case No.251 of 2024 registered for the

offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 341, 232,

325, 307, 354-B, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code

(in short ‘IPC‘).

3. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and is

in custody since 16.04.2025.

4. Allegation against the petitioner is to assault

uncle of informant along with other co-accused persons

causing head and bodily injuries, where assault was caused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42520 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025
2/4

with intention to cause death of uncle of the informant. The

occurrence as per FIR alleged to be arising out of land

dispute.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

petitioner that the allegation against petitioner as per FIR is

to assault the uncle of informant on his head by using farsa

which is a sharp-edged weapon. It is pointed out that if it is

so, then the injuries which alleged to be inflicted by the

petitioner must be of incised in nature in ordinary course but,

upon medical examination, same found lacerated, creating a

doubt qua allegation. It is submitted that the alleged assault is

single without having any intervening circumstances, which

further suggest that petitioner was not under intention to

cause death. In this context, it is further submitted that

several factors be taken into consideration to make out a

prima facie case under Section 307 of IPC like pre and post

conduct of occurrence, nature of weapons, manner of assault

etc. and in support of submission, learned counsel has relied

upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available

through Jage Ram vs. State of Haryana & Ors. [(2015)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42520 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025
3/4

11 SCC 366]. While concluding argument, it is submitted that

investigation of this case is already completed, for which,

charge-sheet has been submitted and, as such, there is no

chance of tampering with the evidence and moreover

petitoiner found involved in two more criminal cases with

same informant side.

6. Learned APP while opposing the prayer for bail

submitted that as per FIR the specific allegation as to assault

on the head of uncle of informant is available against

petitioner.

7. Let it be so, as prima facie assault as alleged to

be caused by petitioner appears non-repeated, without having

any intervening circumstances, coupled with the fact that

investigation of this case is already completed, where

petitioner remains in custody since 16.04.2025, accordingly,

the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned A.C.J.M.-1st, East Champaran, Motihari in

connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No.251 of 2024,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42520 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025
4/4

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of

the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘CrPC‘)/under

Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (for

short ‘BNSS’).

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-

U     T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here