Patna High Court – Orders
Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Singh @ Saroj … vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025
Author: Alok Kumar Pandey
Bench: Alok Kumar Pandey
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53856 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas
======================================================
Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Singh @ Saroj Singh S/o Nirmal Kumar Singh
Resident of Gopalpur, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikash Khanna
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dinara
P.S. Case No. 133/2021 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 427,
353, 332, 333, 384, 120(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal
Code.
3. As per prosecution case, one injured person was
referred to the hospital but during the course of treatment he
died due to which several persons blocked the road to express
the resentment. The informant alongwith police officials reached
at the place of occurrence for clearing the crowd, during course
of clearing the crowd, the people attacked on the police officials
and the petitioner is one among them who is said to have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3
assaulted the police officials.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.05.2025
and bears no criminal antecedent. No incriminating article has
been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
He further submits that the petitioner is only member of mob
and he has nothing to do with the alleged occurrence.
Allegations are general and omnibus in nature and there is no
specific overt-act against the petitioner. He orally submits that
charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no
likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently
opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of
petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also
taking into consideration the material available on record, let the
petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3
with Dinara P.S. Case No. 133/2021, subject to following
conditions:-
(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother
or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the
affidavit in bail application.
(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain
present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates
without appropriate permission, would be a ground for
cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.
(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
amitkumar/-
U T