Saryug Sahani vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2025

0
85


Patna High Court – Orders

Saryug Sahani vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2025

Author: Rajesh Kumar Verma

Bench: Rajesh Kumar Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4435 of 2023
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2023 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     SARYUG SAHANI son of Late Ramautar Sahani
           2.    Arjun Sahani son of Late Ramautar Sahani
           3.    Manohar Kumar son of Saryug Sahani
           4.    Jitendra Sahani son of Jagdish Sahani
           5.    Rajbanshi Sahani son of Ramdhayan Sahani
           6.    Jagdish Sahani son of Mathura Sahani
           7.    Munna Sahani son of Matha Sahani V
                 All R/o villageBalua Briti Tola Ps- Paharpur Dist- E.Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Babu Lal Ram son of Late Yugul Ram R/o Village- Balua Briti Tola Ps-
                 Paharpur Dist- E.Champaran

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate
                                         :        Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   15-04-2025

Heard Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar, learned counsel for

the appellant, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and

Mr.Sadanand Paswan, learned Spl.P.P. for the State.

2. This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for anticipatory bail

by order dated 24.08.2023 in A.B.P. No.3856 of 2023 arising

out of Paharpur P.S.Case No.289 of 2023/G.R.Case No.219 of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4435 of 2023(4) dt.15-04-2025
2/5

2023 dated 22.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge

SC/ST Act, East Champaran at Motihari registered under

Sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 354, 379, 504, 506, 427/34 of the

Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.

3. Allegation against the appellants is that they

assaulted and abused the female member of the informant by

their caste names on account of their opposition to the accused

sowing seeds in the field of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that

the appellants have clean antecedent and they have falsely been

implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the

FIR is false and fabricated and the appellants have not

committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. From a bare

perusal of the FIR it appears that due to land dispute the present

occurrence had taken place and apart from that in view of the

judgment in the case of Hitesh Verma Vs. The State of

Uttarakhand & Anr., reported in (2020) 10 SCC 710,

paragraph-18 which reads as follows:-

“18. Therefore, offence under the Act is not

established merely on the fact that the

informant is a member of Scheduled Caste
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4435 of 2023(4) dt.15-04-2025
3/5

unless there is an intention to humiliate a

member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled

Tribe for the reason that the victim belongs to

such caste. In the present case, the parties are

litigating over possession of the land. The

allegation of hurling of abuses is against a

person who claims title over the property. If

such person happens to be a Scheduled Caste,

the offence under Section 3(1)(r) of the Act is

not made out.

5. Paragraph-18 of the aforesaid judgment and in

the background of the land dispute, no case is made out under

SC/ST Act against the appellants and apart from that, it appears

from the FIR that the date of occurrence as alleged in the FIR is

20.07.2023 but the present FIR has been instituted on

22.07.2023 after delay of about two days without giving any

explanation of delay and there is no specific allegation of any

assault or overt-act attributed against the appellants and no

injury was found on the person of the injured which suggests

that the informant has received any injury in the present

occurrence.

6. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 as well
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4435 of 2023(4) dt.15-04-2025
4/5

as learned Spl.P.P. for the State have vehemently opposed the

prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants.

7. After hearing the parties, in my view for the

purpose of this anticipatory bail, no offence under the provisions

of Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act is made out.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and appellants

have clean antecedent, let the appellants, above named, in the

event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a

period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge SC/ST

Act, East Champaran at Motihari in connection Paharpur

P.S.Case No.289 of 2023/G.R.Case No.219 of 2023, subject to

the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and with

other following conditions:-

(I) Appellants shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4435 of 2023(4) dt.15-04-2025
5/5

(II) If the appellants tamper with the evidence or the

witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall

verify the criminal antecedent of the appellants and in case at

any stage, it is found that the appellants have concealed their

criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

cancellation of bail bond of the appellants. However, the

acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

verification.

9. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and

this appeal stands allowed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here